Permitted six-hall campus at Toureen east of the M18. May 2026 leave-to-appeal refusal advances planning certainty. Capacity definitions conflict in the EIAR; a completed grid agreement, construction start,…
Read overviewArt Data Centres — Ennis campus
Tooreen / Cahernalough, Ennis, County Clare, Ireland
Watch this site
Watch Art Data Centres — Ennis campus
Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.
15 cited sources · 7 utility and planning categories reviewed.
Review evidence and gapsVerify an executed grid connection agreement and import capacity/conditions, energisation programme, gas/AGI delivery, and required operational permits; track CPPA delivery required by the court-confirmed…
Open the full checkOverview
Permitted six-hall campus at Toureen east of the M18. May 2026 leave-to-appeal refusal advances planning certainty. Capacity definitions conflict in the EIAR; a completed grid agreement, construction start, equipment awards and operational fibre entries remain unverified. Phase 1 stays inside this campus record.
- Developer / applicant
- Art Data Centres Limited
- Owner
- Not verified
- Operator
- Not verified
Planning and delivery status
Campus and separate 110 kV substation permissions were signed on 5 April 2024. The High Court dismissed proceedings on 13 March 2026 and leave to appeal on 29 May 2026. The developer announced intended enabling works and an end-2028 phase 1 target; actual commencement and energisation were not verified in the public sources reviewed on 26 September 2026.
Stage source: 29 May 2026Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.
POWER STUDY
Power
What the power evidence establishes
Ennis six-hall campus
No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.
The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.
Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. Evidence reviewed 19 October 2026.
Read the rules and verification levelsCapacity ladder and evidence
Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.
Applied
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Offered
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?Accepted / contracted
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?Energised
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?Conflicts and scope comparisons
200 MW IT description conflicts with per-hall IT and total facility definitions
The 83.5 MVA application is a different measure and milestone from either 200 MW claim. No power factor or PUE is assumed. Public documents do not reconcile the definitions or establish the final import entitlement.
NTS total IT claim
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
MW IT, applicant NTS June 2022, printed page 23.
Chapter 2 total facility claim
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
MW total facility load, applicant chapter 2 printed page 5.
Chapter 2 IT total calculated from six halls
Rule and inputs
6 halls x 27 MW IT per hall = 162 MW IT. This arithmetic preserves the source conflict and does not reconcile or select a design capacity.
- Hall count
- 6 halls
Input evidence
- Applicant EIAR chapter 2, printed page 5 / PDF page 19AWN Consulting for Art Data Centres · Published 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- IT per hall
- 27 MW IT
Input evidence
- Applicant EIAR chapter 2, printed page 5 / PDF page 19AWN Consulting for Art Data Centres · Published 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Derived MW IT from the chapter 2 per-hall claim.
Resolution
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Obtain the approved load schedule and operator application or offer identifying IT MW, facility MW, import MVA and phase boundaries.200 MW IT claim and 83.5 MVA application describe different measures
A 200 MW IT claim and an 83.5 MVA grid application are not a numerical contradiction simply because the figures differ. They measure IT demand and an applicant-reported grid-import request, with different bases and milestones. The inspector describes approximately 200 MW electricity demand supplied by approximately 80 MW from the grid and approximately 120 MW from the gas energy centre, with some rooftop solar. That design account does not reconcile the separate NTS IT versus chapter 2 facility-load conflict, prove a current import agreement or establish generation delivery. No power factor or PUE conversion is made.
NTS campus IT description
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
MW IT claimed by the applicant NTS. Its conflict with chapter 2 total facility load remains unresolved.
Applicant-reported grid application
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
MVA at pre-planning Stage 1 in the June 2022 EIAR. Not an offered, accepted or energised import right.
Proposed on-site energy centre
Approximately MW generation in the inspector account of the proposed supply mix. Not verified delivered output.
Resolution
The supply design explains why grid import alone need not equal campus demand. It does not establish the final electrical design or contractual import rights.
What reconciled approved load and supply schedule links IT MW, facility MW, import MVA, on-site generation and each phase?Ireland grid context
Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.
CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Connection policy for new data centre applications, including matching dispatchable generation or storage, additional renewable electricity and network location assessment. At least 80% of annual demand must be met by additional renewable electricity generated in the Republic of Ireland, with a six-year glide path from energisation. Requirements and transitional scope must be checked against the actual application date and connection position.
A policy requirement is not evidence that a particular site has complied or has connection rights. Onsite or proximate generation is permitted; onsite-only generation is not a universal requirement. Do not retrospectively apply the new application rules to an earlier agreement without checking transitional scope. No fixed publisher update cadence is stated; PowerPlotr proposes a weekly policy check.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionPublished 12 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3EirGrid · Source checked
Implements CRU/2025236. For new transmission data centres at or above 10 MVA, nominated dispatchable generation or storage must match MIC after applicable de-rating and be delivered before energisation or demand ramp-up. Nominated generation is separately connected and metered and participates in the SEM. The stated offer-processing periods are approximately 7.5 calendar months where nominated generation and renewables already have offers, or up to 18 months where associated generation has newly applied through ECP-GSS.
These are conditional application-to-offer periods, not construction or energisation durations, and are excluded from energisation calculations. A complete application, linked generation status and fees matter. An offer is not an accepted agreement. Earlier applications can remain under CRU/21/124. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Technical AssessmentEirGrid · Source checked
Explains application-specific assessment of capacity, voltage, system stability, short-circuit effects and outages. Continuous demand above 50 MW is significant for the Irish 110 kV network and should focus on connection voltages above 110 kV. Dedicated loop-in connections are difficult to integrate and require wider system benefit.
General technical context cannot establish a connection point, headroom or capacity allocation for a particular site. Every proposal still requires operator assessment. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is monthly and after a related policy decision.
EirGrid: Data Centre Technical AssessmentPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Constrained Area OverviewEirGrid · Source checked
Pages 11 to 12 identify high-level potential on the 220 kV network around Galway, Limerick and Cork, subject to individual assessment and policy compliance. The overview considers greater Dublin fully constrained for new data centre development. It advises a prudent mid-2030s assumption for new connections in the identified areas because of work and outage programmes.
Regional opportunity is not site-specific capacity or a contractual right. Mid-2030s is qualitative operator context, not a bounded energisation window or a promised 2035 date. Earlier applications and agreements require their own transitional-policy check. Detailed heat maps are planned through the 2027 Ten Year Transmission Forecast Statement. No recurring publisher cadence is specified; proposed review is monthly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Approves fault ride-through, rate of change of frequency and active power recovery requirements for existing and future transmission-connected demand facilities. The technical requirements include remaining connected within the specified voltage profile, withstanding plus or minus 1 Hz/s and recovering 90% of pre-fault active power within 500 milliseconds after fault clearance and voltage recovery to 0.9 per unit. Compliance is assessed at the point of connection.
The associated Grid Code amendment takes effect on 27 October 2026. This is a separate technical requirement from the December 2025 connection policy. Site compliance, an approved derogation and any demand utilisation restriction need direct evidence. Missing public compliance evidence means unverified, not automatically non-compliant. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkPublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationMPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective dateCommission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid · Source checked
The CRU directs EirGrid to amend the Grid Code five weeks after the 22 September 2026 decision. EirGrid's Grid Code Modifications register labels this approval effective 27 October 2026. The letter applies the technical requirements to all transmission-connected demand facilities.
The effective date does not itself prove compliance or an energisation entitlement at any site. Review the decision, current Grid Code and any approved derogation together. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is weekly through implementation.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid: MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective datePublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAvailability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026ESB Networks · Source checked
Indicates available transformer capacity for demand and generation at distribution substations. The download is labelled July 2026, but station capacity and demand contracts and offers are dated to Q4 2025, with 2024/2025 load readings. The publisher's stated objective is quarterly map updates. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for a replacement file and records the underlying data date separately from its label.
Transformer headroom is not guaranteed upstream network capacity, a connection offer, or site rights. HV locations are indicative. ESB's 6 to 9 month minor-works and approximately 2 to 3 year significant-station-work examples concern MV connections up to 10 MVA under stated conditions; they are not valid timing inputs for large transmission-connected pilots.
ESB Networks: Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDistribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025ESB Networks · Source checked
The DNDP identifies distribution investment and flexibility needs. Its Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025 provides indicative headroom at existing 110 kV and 38 kV substations under four growth scenarios, with annual forecasts to 2030 and five-year intervals to 2050. The publisher says capacity workbooks update annually and network development plans every two years. Proposed PowerPlotr review is monthly.
Workbook headroom does not establish upstream feeder or transmission capacity, final site connections or rights. Future headroom can depend on planned reinforcement; verify the specific project's delivery and consent status. The checked landing page identifies and explains the workbooks; workbook cells have not been imported into the pilot.
ESB Networks: Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationTransmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerEirGrid · Source checked
The checked regulatory publication register lists Transmission Development Plan 2024, the 2024 Ten-Year Transmission Forecast Statement and current adequacy publications. This is the discovery and version-control entry for the earlier published development plan while the 2026 to 2035 draft is under CRU consultation.
A listed project is not evidence that it supplies a particular site, has all consents, or guarantees a delivery date. No reinforcement dependency has been assigned to a pilot merely from geographic proximity. The statutory development-plan cycle is two years; PowerPlotr proposes monthly checks for a new approved version or delivery update.
EirGrid: Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDraft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationCommission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid · Source checked
Consultation opened 7 October 2026 and is scheduled to close 20 November 2026. The linked draft is dated June 2026 and describes planned transmission works, contracted customer connections and indicative delivery timeframes. Development plans are published on a two-year cycle. Proposed PowerPlotr review is weekly during consultation and on publication of the final version.
This is a draft under consultation as at the access date. Do not label it final or treat its project dates as a site connection commitment. A named reinforcement must be matched to published site-specific connection scope before it becomes an energisation dependency.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid: Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationPublished 7 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAll-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035EirGrid and SONI · Source checked
The current adequacy publication assesses demand and generation over 2026 to 2035. It provides the successor resource-adequacy context to older Generation Capacity Statements, together with its main report, workbook, methodology and country assumptions. The main report's data-centre forecast considers projects already connected or with signed connection agreements at its study freeze date.
System adequacy is distinct from local connection headroom. The forecast is not a live site-level connection register and cannot establish a particular site's contracted or energised capacity. Publication and data-freeze dates differ. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for the next assessment, corrections or updated inputs; no fixed publication day is assumed.
EirGrid and SONI: All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationAn Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked
Official search for appeals, direct strategic infrastructure applications and related cases, including grid works. The current authority is An Coimisiún Pleanála, formerly An Bord Pleanála. Search by case reference, location, applicant and infrastructure to match a site with grid planning decisions and conditions. Proposed review is weekly and whenever a relevant case changes.
A grid planning application, pre-application consultation or permission does not establish an executed connection agreement, import capacity, route rights or energisation. Check the actual decision documents and exact development boundary. A target decision date is not the decision. The portal has no guaranteed fixed case-update interval.
An Coimisiún Pleanála: An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationLocal Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersLocal Government Management Agency and local planning authorities · Source checked
Official portal for local authority planning applications. Use the specific authority register and case documents to establish published substation, cable, generation, storage and site planning scope. Proposed review is weekly for active pilot cases and when new documents are lodged.
Portal coverage and historical files vary by authority, so the original authority record remains necessary. Applicant statements remain applicant evidence unless independently corroborated. Planning does not prove a connection offer or agreement, and an indicative equipment rating is not contracted import capacity. No common publisher refresh interval is stated.
Local Government Management Agency and local planning authorities: Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationCountry coverage: Ireland pilot. View all country sources and refresh schedules.
Derived energisation window
The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.
Rule
Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.
- Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895: earliest readiness
- Unknown
Input evidence
- ACP VA03.313895 substation and transmission line approvalAn Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 5 April 2024 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895: latest readiness
- Unknown
Input evidence
- ACP VA03.313895 substation and transmission line approvalAn Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 5 April 2024 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Dependencies driving the range
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
- Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895: Approval with conditions signed 5 April 2024. Permission date does not establish works completion or energisation.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme: unknown.
What the earliest case requires
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895 is ready by the earliest case, which has no published readiness date: Approval with conditions signed 5 April 2024. Permission date does not establish works completion or energisation.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
Missing inputs leave the range open
- A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
- An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
- Earliest readiness for Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895.
- A published upper readiness year for Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
Indicative HV and connection capex
Unknown
Rule and scope
Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Scope questions
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
- Confirm underground route and circuit-kilometre quantities to Ennis and each dropdown mast.
- Confirm transformer duties, firm design configuration and retained works in the existing Ennis station.
- Confirm contestable, non-contestable and customer-owned works, exclusions and current price basis.
Alternatives and policy exposure
Behind-the-meter generation
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Battery storage
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Private wire
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Gas
- AWN Consulting for Art Data CentresPublished 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Connection claim against current policy
- Compliance unverified
The applicable connection-policy regime is unverified. The historical EIAR application claim does not establish its actual receipt date, whether it remains in process, or whether a later application superseded it. Confirm operator treatment under the earlier rules or CRU/2025236 before assessing generation, flexibility, renewable supply and location conditions.
Rule: DCCOPP Version 3 applies to new applications from 12 December 2025; earlier applications still being processed remain under CRU/21/124. Do not choose the regime from an EIAR publication date. - Compliance unverified
MPID 345 introduces separate technical requirements for transmission-connected demand, including future connections. The amendment becomes effective on 27 October 2026, derived as five weeks after the 22 September 2026 decision. Ennis compliance evidence or any approved derogation has not been established.
Rule: Assess fault ride-through, rate of change of frequency and post-fault active-power recovery at the point of connection. Missing public compliance evidence is a question to resolve, not a finding of non-compliance.
Rule and inputs
Compare the documented application position with operator transition rules, then separately review the MPID 345 technical requirement. Effective date = 22 September 2026 + 5 weeks = 27 October 2026. No site-specific policy compliance is inferred from planning approval or proposed generation.
- Historical applicant-reported application
- 83.5 MVA
Input evidence
- Applicant EIAR June 2022, chapter 2 section 2.4.1, printed page 9 / PDF page 23AWN Consulting for Art Data Centres · Published 2022-06 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Actual application receipt date and present processing status
- Unknown
- Connection-policy transitional rule
- Earlier applications still being processed retain CRU/21/124 treatment
Input evidence
- EirGrid DCCOPP Version 3, 20 May 2026, printed page 8, transitional applicationsEirGrid · Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- MPID 345 transmission demand scope
- Existing and future connections
Input evidence
- CRU2026145, 22 September 2026, transmission-connected demand scopeCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Published 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Decision publication date
- 2026-09-22
Input evidence
- CRU2026145, executive summary, implementation effective-date ruleCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Published 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Implementation interval
- 5 weeks
Input evidence
- CRU2026145, executive summary, implementation effective-date ruleCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Published 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Open questions for a Reality Check
Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.
54 questions to resolve
- What is the straight-line distance using evidenced site and connection-point coordinates?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What route length is published for the grid connection?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What was the actual EirGrid application receipt or deemed-complete date?
The June 2022 EIAR publication month is not the application date.
- What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated offered capacity milestone for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the offered capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?
Verification has not been established.
- What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated accepted capacity milestone for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the accepted capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?
Verification has not been established.
- What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated energised capacity milestone for Ennis six-hall campus?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the energised capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?
Verification has not been established.
- What connection agreement type has been executed or offered?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What capacity ramps or phased import limits are published?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What curtailment, flexible demand or dispatch obligations apply?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What generation or storage conditions are in the connection agreement?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What connection securities have been posted, and are they current?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What connection longstop dates and extension conditions apply?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the reconciled total IT load, following the conflicting NTS and chapter 2 definitions?
The NTS calls 200 MW IT load; chapter 2 gives 27 MW IT per hall and 200 MW total facility load.
- Which approved design schedule reconciles Ennis IT load and facility load?
Competing applicant definitions remain unresolved.
- Obtain the approved load schedule and operator application or offer identifying IT MW, facility MW, import MVA and phase boundaries.
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What reconciled approved load and supply schedule links IT MW, facility MW, import MVA, on-site generation and each phase?
The supply design explains why grid import alone need not equal campus demand. It does not establish the final electrical design or contractual import rights.
- What published operator process timeline applies to this project and current capacity rung?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which reinforcement projects does this connection depend on, with published completion dates?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What published earliest completion year applies to energisationInputs.gridWorksPlanning.value?
No bounded completion year is published.
- What published latest completion year applies to energisationInputs.gridWorksPlanning.value?
No bounded completion year is published.
- Which policy conditions apply and when can each be fulfilled?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What complete priced scope and published route lengths apply to the eight-bay GIS, step-down transformers, circuit diversions and Ennis links?
A published design describes a new eight-bay 110 kV GIS, step-down station, two underground links to Ennis and two overhead-line diversions. Route quantities, final demarcation and a matched dated reference band are not established.
- Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What observed input establishes Actual application receipt date and present processing status for policyExposure?
The derivation has an unknown input and cannot establish a precise value.
- What dated and quoted source supports the input Actual application receipt date and present processing status?
Each derivation input needs observed provenance.
- What current operator evidence supersedes the June 2022 application claim?
Research hand-off question.
- Which reinforcement, outage and construction programme governs the proposed grid works?
Research hand-off question.
- Are the gas/AGI works, operational permits and grid-support duties deliverable for the same phase?
Research hand-off question.
- Which policy transition provisions apply to any current or replacement application?
Research hand-off question.
- What operator-confirmed receipt date and current application status determine the Ennis connection-policy regime?
Research hand-off question.
- What MPID 345 studies, compliance confirmation or approved derogation apply at the proposed transmission point of connection?
Research hand-off question.
- Confirm underground route and circuit-kilometre quantities to Ennis and each dropdown mast.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Confirm transformer duties, firm design configuration and retained works in the existing Ennis station.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Confirm contestable, non-contestable and customer-owned works, exclusions and current price basis.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Resolve the conflicting sources: 200 MW IT description conflicts with per-hall IT and total facility definitions
The 83.5 MVA application is a different measure and milestone from either 200 MW claim. No power factor or PUE is assumed. Public documents do not reconcile the definitions or establish the final import entitlement.
- Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Earliest readiness for Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: A published upper readiness year for Ennis 110 kV GIS substation and transmission connections, VA03.313895.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.
Request a Reality CheckEarlier capacity notes and source context
Planned six-hall campus. The June 2022 NTS describes 200 MW IT, but EIAR chapter 2 describes 200 MW total load and 27 MW IT per hall. The published definitions conflict; no verified operating or secured-import capacity is implied.
Conflicting published claimProject capacity: Planned six-hall campus. The June 2022 NTS describes 200 MW IT, but EIAR chapter 2 describes 200 MW total load and 27 MW IT per hall. The published definitions conflict; no verified operating or secured-import capacity is implied.
NTS IT description — conflicts with chapter 2: June 2022 NTS printed page 23 (PDF page 36), proposed ultimate load; retained as a source-specific claim, not reconciled design capacity.
EIAR chapter 2 total load description: Chapter 2 printed page 5 (PDF page 19) describes 27 MW IT / circa 34 MW total per hall, and 200 MW total across six halls. Conflicts with NTS and chapter 13 IT description.
June 2022 NTS printed page 23 (PDF page 36), proposed ultimate load; retained as a source-specific claim, not reconciled design capacity.
Conflicting published claimProject capacity: Planned six-hall campus. The June 2022 NTS describes 200 MW IT, but EIAR chapter 2 describes 200 MW total load and 27 MW IT per hall. The published definitions conflict; no verified operating or secured-import capacity is implied.
NTS IT description — conflicts with chapter 2: June 2022 NTS printed page 23 (PDF page 36), proposed ultimate load; retained as a source-specific claim, not reconciled design capacity.
EIAR chapter 2 total load description: Chapter 2 printed page 5 (PDF page 19) describes 27 MW IT / circa 34 MW total per hall, and 200 MW total across six halls. Conflicts with NTS and chapter 13 IT description.
Chapter 2 printed page 5 (PDF page 19) describes 27 MW IT / circa 34 MW total per hall, and 200 MW total across six halls. Conflicts with NTS and chapter 13 IT description.
Conflicting published claimProject capacity: Planned six-hall campus. The June 2022 NTS describes 200 MW IT, but EIAR chapter 2 describes 200 MW total load and 27 MW IT per hall. The published definitions conflict; no verified operating or secured-import capacity is implied.
NTS IT description — conflicts with chapter 2: June 2022 NTS printed page 23 (PDF page 36), proposed ultimate load; retained as a source-specific claim, not reconciled design capacity.
EIAR chapter 2 total load description: Chapter 2 printed page 5 (PDF page 19) describes 27 MW IT / circa 34 MW total per hall, and 200 MW total across six halls. Conflicts with NTS and chapter 13 IT description.
EIAR chapter 2 section 2.4.1 records an EirGrid application at Pre-planning Stage 1 in 2022. This is not an accepted connection offer or secured import right.
Historical applicationProject capacity: Planned six-hall campus. The June 2022 NTS describes 200 MW IT, but EIAR chapter 2 describes 200 MW total load and 27 MW IT per hall. The published definitions conflict; no verified operating or secured-import capacity is implied.
NTS IT description — conflicts with chapter 2: June 2022 NTS printed page 23 (PDF page 36), proposed ultimate load; retained as a source-specific claim, not reconciled design capacity.
EIAR chapter 2 total load description: Chapter 2 printed page 5 (PDF page 19) describes 27 MW IT / circa 34 MW total per hall, and 200 MW total across six halls. Conflicts with NTS and chapter 13 IT description.
A 110 kV GIS substation and transmission diversions have planning approval. The 2022 EIAR records an 83.5 MVA application at EirGrid Pre-planning Stage 1. In March 2026 the developer said legal clearance opened the way to a connection agreement. Signed import rights, firm/non-firm terms, energisation, gas-supply agreement and equipment awards remain unverified.
IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.
Planning & utilities
7 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.
Planning & decisions
DocumentedCampus PL03.314474 and substation VA03.313895 were approved with conditions on 5 April 2024. Judicial review was dismissed on 13 March 2026; leave to appeal was dismissed on 29 May 2026. These are legal/planning milestones, not evidence of construction. No commencement was independently verified.
Sources & next check
Land-use zoning
DocumentedThe adopted Clare County Development Plan 2023–2029 identifies Toureen ENT3 / TS9 for a data-centre campus: 45 ha Enterprise plus 10 ha Buffer. The buffer is not developable data-centre land. Zoning supports the use but does not evidence a power allocation.
Sources & next check
Grid & import rights
Partial evidenceA 110 kV GIS substation and transmission diversions have planning approval. The 2022 EIAR records an 83.5 MVA application at EirGrid Pre-planning Stage 1. In March 2026 the developer said legal clearance opened the way to a connection agreement. Signed import rights, firm/non-firm terms, energisation, gas-supply agreement and equipment awards remain unverified.
Sources & next check
Fibre & dark fibre
Partial evidenceThe 2022 EIAR identifies PiPiper on Tulla Road, Aurora along the gas alignment and ESB Telecoms at the adjoining substation. Open Eir proposed existing ducts from Drumbiggle; BT access was conditional on a then-current ducts dispute. Aurora currently confirms an Ennis metro network and dark-fibre lease/IRU products. This supports route feasibility, not contracted or commissioned diverse campus entries.
Sources & next check
Land, footprint & access
Partial evidenceEIAR describes an approximately 60 ha development footprint. The adopted plan separately identifies 45 ha Enterprise and 10 ha Buffer at ENT3/TS9; these are different scopes and the buffer is not net developable data-centre land.
Sources & next check
Flood, ground & environment
Partial evidenceApplicant’s Stage 1 flood assessment concludes that the proposed data-centre area is not at flood risk and would not worsen neighbouring risk. This is the planning-study conclusion, not an independent current flood certification.
Sources & next check
Water, cooling & heat
Partial evidenceApplicant design uses air cooling with occasional evaporative cooling above 27°C. Chapter 2 estimates approximately 1,000 m³/day during those conditions and proposes 48-hour rainwater storage before mains use. These are design assumptions, not observed consumption or a current water allocation.
Sources & next check
Not assessed
Evidence still needed
- Ownership & development control
Legal title, land-owning entity, development-control route and restrictions need verification. A named developer does not establish availability.
- Demand & location fit
Customer geography, latency, cloud or exchange nodes and a supported use case need project-specific evidence; national growth alone is insufficient.
- Programme & delivery
Permission expiry, commencement, energisation, enabling works, long-lead procurement and phase handovers need a reconciled programme.
Project team
Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.
Architect
Architectural design; EIAR chapter 1 team table.
Appointment sourceEngineering consultant
Civil engineering and site/substation infrastructure design; HDR report identifies CSEA civil drawings.
Appointment sourceEngineering and energy design; HDR authored the 110 kV GIS substation report. Hurley Palmer Flatt is named in the EIAR team and cooling-water technical note. Design evidence, not MEP installation award.
Appointment sourceTraffic and transportation assessment; EIAR chapter 1 team table.
Appointment sourceSite investigations undertaken April–May 2021, including trial pits and boreholes; EIAR chapter 5. Not a main groundworks construction appointment.
Appointment sourceEmergency-report technical note submitted as further information; campus inspector report, printed page 7.
Appointment sourceProject manager
Development manager for Art Data Centres, explicitly stated in the company project announcement; current construction delivery/QS appointment not established.
Appointment sourceSpecialists & vendors
EIAR coordination and environmental assessment, including water, air, noise, material assets and waste.
Appointment sourcePlanning consultant in the EIAR team table; appeal response documents also considered by the High Court.
Appointment sourceBiodiversity assessment and appropriate-assessment screening; EIAR chapter 1 team table.
Appointment sourceLandscape design/management and landscape and visual impact assessment; EIAR chapters 1 and 2.
Appointment sourceArchaeological, architectural and cultural heritage assessment; EIAR chapter 1 team table.
Appointment sourceVirtual public consultation for Art Data Centre Ennis; vendor portfolio identifies Tom McNamara as client.
Appointment sourceUnlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.
Sources
Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.
- An Coimisiún Pleanála PL03.314474 — campus permissionpleanala.ie · 5 Apr 2024
- An Coimisiún Pleanála VA03.313895 — substation approvalpleanala.ie · 5 Apr 2024
- Applicant EIAR — consultant team, capacity definitions, utilities and fibre routespleanala.ie · Publication date unstated
- Applicant EIAR non-technical summary — June 2022, conflicting IT load descriptionpleanala.ie · Publication date unstated
- HDR — 110 kV GIS substation report, issue 06pleanala.ie · 9 Jun 2022
- Campus inspector report — emergency report and planning assessmentpleanala.ie · Publication date unstated
- Clare County Development Plan 2023–2029, Volume 3a — ENT3 / TS9 Toureenclarecoco.ie · Publication date unstated
- High Court — Doyle (No. 3), [2026] IEHC 156, proceedings dismissedwww2.courts.ie · 13 Mar 2026
- High Court — Doyle (No. 4), [2026] IEHC 340, leave to appeal dismissedbailii.org · 29 May 2026
- Developer statement reported by Gordon Deegan — enabling works intention, connection agreement and phase 1 targetbreakingnews.ie · 14 Mar 2026
- Aurora Telecom — current national and Ennis metropolitan networkauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
- Aurora Telecom — dark fibre lease and IRU productauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
- Tom McNamara & Partners — company announcement of development-manager rolelinkedin.com · Publication date unstated
- Innovision — virtual public consultation portfolio, Art Data Centre Ennisinnovision.ie · Publication date unstated
- Applicant EIAR chapter 5 — Ground Investigations Ireland site investigationspleanala.ie · Publication date unstated
Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.
