An explained scenario assessment of five factors, issued only when its evidence gates pass.
ASSESSMENT METHOD
A score should explain a decision, not hide it.
Each record links to its source and states what remains unresolved. The current beta uses manual research and device-local working notes. Qualification requires independent evidence of control, power and a viable development route.
A structured analyst judgement of completeness and source quality, not a probability.
Constraints that cannot be averaged away by stronger factors elsewhere.
TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED, EVIDENCE-LED
Why this is not “just ask a chatbot.”
General-purpose AI can help discover and summarise. It does not, by itself, maintain a permissioned opportunity pipeline, resolve parcels and counterparties, preserve claim-level provenance, monitor changes or apply the same buyer mandate every time.
The same fields, definitions and evidence classes across every market.
Dated research notes remain visible. Automated field history and conflict detection are future work.
Authority, material claims and disclosure scope require review.
Public research is accessible. Private customer workspaces and document permissions are future work.
QUALIFICATION BEFORE RANKING
Control and power are separate gates.
A named owner is not an available site. Record a specific parcel, a plausible bilateral route, current marketing checks, usable area, a planning route and customer demand. The power class records the maturity of a specific capacity claim. It does not establish acquisition readiness, contractual rights or transferable supply. Current records remain research or market intelligence until every gate is met.
POWER STUDY METHOD
Every power statement has a basis.
Observed means a dated quotation from a named public source. Derived means a calculation from observed inputs using an explicit rule. Unknown means the evidence is missing or does not establish the stated field. A plausible value is never used to close a gap.
The Ireland pilot extends the existing records. Other countries retain an unknown site-level power position until their evidence is reviewed. A source accessed today does not make its historical claim current.
Capacity ladder and class
Read applied, offered, accepted / contracted and energised MVA as four separate rungs. Every rung retains its claim date, site or phase boundary, source quotation and verification level. The class is derived from the highest rung supported at document seen or better. A conflicting claim remains visible with both sources and cannot silently replace another value.
A site-specific accepted, contracted or energised import-capacity rung is supported at document seen or better. Public evidence still does not prove the present contract, retained rights or transferability.
A site-specific import-capacity offer is supported at document seen or better. Acceptance, satisfaction of conditions and energisation remain separate questions.
A site-specific import-capacity application is supported at document seen or better. An application establishes neither an offer nor capacity allocation.
No application, offer, accepted / contracted or energised import-capacity rung meets document seen or better. Proximity, a source count and marketing claims cannot raise the class.
IT load, facility load and import capacity are separate. MW is not converted to MVA without observed conversion inputs. A 200 MW IT campus claim and an 83.5 MVA application can describe different electrical boundaries or phases. They are retained as an unresolved scope comparison until documents establish the relationship.
What the verification levels require
| Level | Required evidence |
|---|---|
| Self-declared | A named developer, owner or other interested party states the claim. Repetition in press coverage does not independently confirm it. |
| Document seen | A reviewed source document directly records the specific ladder event, amount and site or phase. A planning document that repeats an applicant’s power claim remains self-declared for that claim. Seeing a document is not proof of a current contractual right. |
| Independently corroborated | Independent evidence confirms the same material claim, capacity boundary and event. Two articles relying on the same press release are one provenance chain. |
| Third-party confirmed | A competent network operator or other authoritative party directly confirms the particular event and capacity. A register entry is assessed for the fact it actually records, without implying contract access or transfer rights. |
Publisher quality and claim provenance are distinct. An official document can record a self-declared applicant statement. Publication date, event date and access date are stored separately. Where a date is not stated, it stays unknown.
Derived energisation window
The window is a scenario range, never a promised connection date. Start with the evidenced ladder event date plus the operator’s published time remaining from that same stage. Set the earliest bound to the latest of the supported process minimum, every required reinforcement’s earliest completion, grid-works planning availability and any dated policy prerequisites. Set the latest bound to the latest of the supported process maximum and those dependencies’ supported upper bounds.
All binding dependencies must be accounted for. Missing stage dates, an inapplicable process duration, unconfirmed reinforcement, pending planning or unmet policy conditions leave the affected bound open. A one-sided result is shown only when its assumptions are explicit. With no defensible bound, earliest and latest remain unknown. The model does not invent a two-year, five-year or other allowance for an unknown.
Each result displays the actual inputs, the rule, the dependencies that drive it and what would have to be true for the earliest case. An operator’s decision or application-processing duration is not treated as a construction or energisation duration. An observed historic energisation event is not a derived future delivery window.
Indicative HV and connection capex
Country reference rows retain voltage, configuration, currency, price base year, low and high values, unit, inclusions, exclusions, source and source date. Eligible categories include a shared substation bay, a new 110 kV or 132 kV substation, a 220 kV or 275 kV GIS substation, underground and overhead routes per kilometre, and a switching station. A reference is populated only from a published index or report that supports that category and price basis.
For a complete published scope, the indicative low and high totals are the sum of each observed quantity multiplied by the matching reference low and high rate. Every component and input is shown. Different currencies, price bases, configurations or scopes are not added without a sourced adjustment rule. Straight-line distance is not route length. No inflation, exchange rate, contingency or owner’s cost is assumed.
If the published scope or an eligible reference is missing, the complete connection capex band remains unknown. Partial benchmarks may be shown as context with their exclusions; they cannot be labelled a total site connection budget. Scope questions identify the information needed next.
Policy, alternatives and open questions
Behind-the-meter generation, battery storage, private wire and gas retain their own evidence and planning or policy status. Their ratings are never treated as site import capacity. Policy exposure states the operative rule, effective date, whether it applies to this connection and the observed condition that appears inconsistent. Uncertain applicability remains a question, rather than a finding of non-compliance.
Open questions are generated from the unknown fields, incomplete window inputs, missing capex scope and unresolved conflicts. They form the document request and specialist-check list for a Power Reality Check. None of the public research establishes contractual rights or a proven energisation date.
Country sources and refresh cadence
Country files record each source, what it can establish, its scheduled review frequency and the actual last check. A planned cadence is not evidence that an automated review ran. Check policy again before any paid assessment and whenever a new decision is published; check every site-critical source again when issuing an opinion.
| Country | Coverage stage | Sources and cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | Five-record pilot first | EirGrid demand publications, transmission development and adequacy reports; ESB Networks capacity maps; CRU connection policy; planning authority and An Coimisiún Pleanála infrastructure decisions. Entry-level schedules and last checks appear below. |
| United Kingdom | Context only until site pilot completes | NESO connection registers and reform gates; the relevant DNO’s capacity heatmap. Site-specific evidence must establish the node and applicable queue position. |
| Spain | Context only until site pilot completes | REE access capacity by node, distribution operator capacity maps and national network planning. Published headroom alone does not establish access rights. |
| Poland | Context only until site pilot completes | PSE and relevant DSO connection conditions, application information and refusals. Published figures require their date and demand or generation boundary. |
| Netherlands | Context only until site pilot completes | TenneT and Netbeheer Nederland congestion information. A mapped location does not establish a site connection offer. |
| Denmark | Context only until site pilot completes | Energinet connection status and the applicable March 2026 pause documentation. The exact scope and subsequent changes must be checked before applying it to a site. |
IrelandIreland pilot · 15 source entries
CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Connection policy for new data centre applications, including matching dispatchable generation or storage, additional renewable electricity and network location assessment. At least 80% of annual demand must be met by additional renewable electricity generated in the Republic of Ireland, with a six-year glide path from energisation. Requirements and transitional scope must be checked against the actual application date and connection position.
A policy requirement is not evidence that a particular site has complied or has connection rights. Onsite or proximate generation is permitted; onsite-only generation is not a universal requirement. Do not retrospectively apply the new application rules to an earlier agreement without checking transitional scope. No fixed publisher update cadence is stated; PowerPlotr proposes a weekly policy check.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionPublished 12 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3EirGrid · Source checked
Implements CRU/2025236. For new transmission data centres at or above 10 MVA, nominated dispatchable generation or storage must match MIC after applicable de-rating and be delivered before energisation or demand ramp-up. Nominated generation is separately connected and metered and participates in the SEM. The stated offer-processing periods are approximately 7.5 calendar months where nominated generation and renewables already have offers, or up to 18 months where associated generation has newly applied through ECP-GSS.
These are conditional application-to-offer periods, not construction or energisation durations, and are excluded from energisation calculations. A complete application, linked generation status and fees matter. An offer is not an accepted agreement. Earlier applications can remain under CRU/21/124. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Technical AssessmentEirGrid · Source checked
Explains application-specific assessment of capacity, voltage, system stability, short-circuit effects and outages. Continuous demand above 50 MW is significant for the Irish 110 kV network and should focus on connection voltages above 110 kV. Dedicated loop-in connections are difficult to integrate and require wider system benefit.
General technical context cannot establish a connection point, headroom or capacity allocation for a particular site. Every proposal still requires operator assessment. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is monthly and after a related policy decision.
EirGrid: Data Centre Technical AssessmentPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Constrained Area OverviewEirGrid · Source checked
Pages 11 to 12 identify high-level potential on the 220 kV network around Galway, Limerick and Cork, subject to individual assessment and policy compliance. The overview considers greater Dublin fully constrained for new data centre development. It advises a prudent mid-2030s assumption for new connections in the identified areas because of work and outage programmes.
Regional opportunity is not site-specific capacity or a contractual right. Mid-2030s is qualitative operator context, not a bounded energisation window or a promised 2035 date. Earlier applications and agreements require their own transitional-policy check. Detailed heat maps are planned through the 2027 Ten Year Transmission Forecast Statement. No recurring publisher cadence is specified; proposed review is monthly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Approves fault ride-through, rate of change of frequency and active power recovery requirements for existing and future transmission-connected demand facilities. The technical requirements include remaining connected within the specified voltage profile, withstanding plus or minus 1 Hz/s and recovering 90% of pre-fault active power within 500 milliseconds after fault clearance and voltage recovery to 0.9 per unit. Compliance is assessed at the point of connection.
The associated Grid Code amendment takes effect on 27 October 2026. This is a separate technical requirement from the December 2025 connection policy. Site compliance, an approved derogation and any demand utilisation restriction need direct evidence. Missing public compliance evidence means unverified, not automatically non-compliant. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkPublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationMPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective dateCommission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid · Source checked
The CRU directs EirGrid to amend the Grid Code five weeks after the 22 September 2026 decision. EirGrid's Grid Code Modifications register labels this approval effective 27 October 2026. The letter applies the technical requirements to all transmission-connected demand facilities.
The effective date does not itself prove compliance or an energisation entitlement at any site. Review the decision, current Grid Code and any approved derogation together. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is weekly through implementation.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid: MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective datePublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAvailability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026ESB Networks · Source checked
Indicates available transformer capacity for demand and generation at distribution substations. The download is labelled July 2026, but station capacity and demand contracts and offers are dated to Q4 2025, with 2024/2025 load readings. The publisher's stated objective is quarterly map updates. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for a replacement file and records the underlying data date separately from its label.
Transformer headroom is not guaranteed upstream network capacity, a connection offer, or site rights. HV locations are indicative. ESB's 6 to 9 month minor-works and approximately 2 to 3 year significant-station-work examples concern MV connections up to 10 MVA under stated conditions; they are not valid timing inputs for large transmission-connected pilots.
ESB Networks: Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDistribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025ESB Networks · Source checked
The DNDP identifies distribution investment and flexibility needs. Its Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025 provides indicative headroom at existing 110 kV and 38 kV substations under four growth scenarios, with annual forecasts to 2030 and five-year intervals to 2050. The publisher says capacity workbooks update annually and network development plans every two years. Proposed PowerPlotr review is monthly.
Workbook headroom does not establish upstream feeder or transmission capacity, final site connections or rights. Future headroom can depend on planned reinforcement; verify the specific project's delivery and consent status. The checked landing page identifies and explains the workbooks; workbook cells have not been imported into the pilot.
ESB Networks: Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationTransmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerEirGrid · Source checked
The checked regulatory publication register lists Transmission Development Plan 2024, the 2024 Ten-Year Transmission Forecast Statement and current adequacy publications. This is the discovery and version-control entry for the earlier published development plan while the 2026 to 2035 draft is under CRU consultation.
A listed project is not evidence that it supplies a particular site, has all consents, or guarantees a delivery date. No reinforcement dependency has been assigned to a pilot merely from geographic proximity. The statutory development-plan cycle is two years; PowerPlotr proposes monthly checks for a new approved version or delivery update.
EirGrid: Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDraft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationCommission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid · Source checked
Consultation opened 7 October 2026 and is scheduled to close 20 November 2026. The linked draft is dated June 2026 and describes planned transmission works, contracted customer connections and indicative delivery timeframes. Development plans are published on a two-year cycle. Proposed PowerPlotr review is weekly during consultation and on publication of the final version.
This is a draft under consultation as at the access date. Do not label it final or treat its project dates as a site connection commitment. A named reinforcement must be matched to published site-specific connection scope before it becomes an energisation dependency.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid: Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationPublished 7 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAll-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035EirGrid and SONI · Source checked
The current adequacy publication assesses demand and generation over 2026 to 2035. It provides the successor resource-adequacy context to older Generation Capacity Statements, together with its main report, workbook, methodology and country assumptions. The main report's data-centre forecast considers projects already connected or with signed connection agreements at its study freeze date.
System adequacy is distinct from local connection headroom. The forecast is not a live site-level connection register and cannot establish a particular site's contracted or energised capacity. Publication and data-freeze dates differ. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for the next assessment, corrections or updated inputs; no fixed publication day is assumed.
EirGrid and SONI: All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationAn Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked
Official search for appeals, direct strategic infrastructure applications and related cases, including grid works. The current authority is An Coimisiún Pleanála, formerly An Bord Pleanála. Search by case reference, location, applicant and infrastructure to match a site with grid planning decisions and conditions. Proposed review is weekly and whenever a relevant case changes.
A grid planning application, pre-application consultation or permission does not establish an executed connection agreement, import capacity, route rights or energisation. Check the actual decision documents and exact development boundary. A target decision date is not the decision. The portal has no guaranteed fixed case-update interval.
An Coimisiún Pleanála: An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAn Coimisiún Pleanála weekly listsAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked
Weekly lists support monitoring of new cases and decisions. They are a discovery source for grid infrastructure and associated generation that may affect a site. Publisher cadence and proposed PowerPlotr review are weekly.
A list entry must be followed to the case and underlying documents before becoming a site-level power statement. Discovery of a nearby infrastructure project is not evidence of a connection dependency or capacity entitlement.
An Coimisiún Pleanála: An Coimisiún Pleanála weekly listsPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationStrategic Infrastructure Development and pre-application consultationsAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked
Explains direct strategic infrastructure applications and the pre-application consultation process, with separate guidance for applicants, planning authorities and the public. It is a route for discovering early grid and generation proposals before a final application or decision. Proposed review is monthly and on procedural change.
Public awareness of a pre-application consultation is not participation in that consultation, a permission, or a grid reservation. The existence of a consultation does not establish that a project will proceed. No fixed publisher refresh interval is stated.
An Coimisiún Pleanála: Strategic Infrastructure Development and pre-application consultationsPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationLocal Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersLocal Government Management Agency and local planning authorities · Source checked
Official portal for local authority planning applications. Use the specific authority register and case documents to establish published substation, cable, generation, storage and site planning scope. Proposed review is weekly for active pilot cases and when new documents are lodged.
Portal coverage and historical files vary by authority, so the original authority record remains necessary. Applicant statements remain applicant evidence unless independently corroborated. Planning does not prove a connection offer or agreement, and an indicative equipment rating is not contracted import capacity. No common publisher refresh interval is stated.
Local Government Management Agency and local planning authorities: Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationPublished connection cost references
| Configuration | Voltage | Type / unit | Low | High | Currency | Price base | Use and source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit | 110 / 132 / 150 kV | overhead per km | 570,000 | 910,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits | 110 / 132 / 150 kV | overhead per km | 300,000 | 390,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 220 kV, 1 circuit | 220 kV | overhead per km | 320,000 | 510,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 220 kV, 2 circuits | 220 kV | overhead per km | 440,000 | 740,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit | 110 / 132 / 150 kV | underground per km | 560,000 | 1,590,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits | 110 / 132 / 150 kV | underground per km | 1,330,000 | 3,580,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 220 kV, 1 circuit | 220 kV | underground per km | 1,030,000 | 2,400,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| 220 kV, 2 circuits | 220 kV | underground per km | 2,990,000 | 4,690,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| New GIS station, 0 to 5 bays, all reported voltage classes | kV | station per item | 5,480,000 | 15,110,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| New GIS station, 6 to 9 bays, all reported voltage classes | kV | station per item | 8,540,000 | 12,600,000 | EUR | Unknown | Context only
|
| New AIS line bay in existing 110 kV single busbar outdoor station | 110 kV | bay per item | 763,440 | 763,440 | EUR | 2026 | Context only
|
| 630 square millimetre aluminium XLPE, single circuit, exactly one kilometre | 110 kV | underground per km | 398,640 | 398,640 | EUR | 2026 | Context only
|
| Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 31.5 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension | 110 kV | station per item | 1,504,210 | 1,504,210 | EUR | 2026 | Context only
|
| Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 63 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension | 110 kV | station per item | 1,826,850 | 1,826,850 | EUR | 2026 | Context only
|
| Complete shared substation bay connection in Ireland | 110 / 220 kV | Unknown: A published AIS electrical bay component does not establish civils, shared allocation or a complete connection cost.Scope questions
| No eligible reference | ||||
| Complete new 110 kV substation in Ireland | 110 kV | Unknown: The ESB Networks 2026 whole-station types are discontinued; current transformer components exclude civil works.Scope questions
| No eligible reference | ||||
| New 132 kV substation | 132 kV | Unknown: No Irish same-scope published cost band established; the voltage is a UK comparison requirement.Scope questions
| No eligible reference | ||||
| Complete new 220 kV or 275 kV GIS substation | 220 / 275 kV | Unknown: The EU GIS comparison is grouped by bays, without a voltage-specific matched Irish band.Scope questions
| No eligible reference | ||||
| Complete switching station | 110 / 220 kV | Unknown: No matched complete Irish public construction band verified.Scope questions
| No eligible reference | ||||
United KingdomPrepared context; site research staged · 6 source entries
Connections reports and registersNational Energy System Operator (NESO) · Source checked
Official directory of connection registers and the Transmission Works Report. NESO states that its connection registers are published twice weekly. The works report identifies reinforcement schemes intended to facilitate connections.
Great Britain only. The TEC register concerns transmission entry capacity and must not be presented as a complete demand or data-centre import-capacity register. A listing does not establish a site's import agreement, conditions or energisation. Northern Ireland source coverage remains to be established.
National Energy System Operator (NESO): Connections reports and registersPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 3 daysRead the source quotationConnections Reform design documents and methodologiesNational Energy System Operator (NESO) · Source checked
Dated source library for Gate 2 Criteria, Connections Network Design and Project Designation methodologies, approved versions, consultations and subsequent correspondence. Use the applicable version and its Ofgem decision when checking a claim about reform gates.
A consultation, draft or submission to Ofgem is not proof of an effective rule. Direct transmission demand and distribution demand require separate scope checks. No individual site's Gate 2 allocation, accepted offer or delivery date has been checked in this source-registry stage. Publisher update interval is not stated; seven days is PowerPlotr's review target.
National Energy System Operator (NESO): Connections Reform design documents and methodologiesPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationNESO implements electricity grid connection reforms to unlock investment in Great BritainNational Energy System Operator (NESO) · Source checked
Operator announcement of the reformed delivery pipeline, including transmission-connected demand, with links to results and methodology. Establishes that infrastructure delivery and planning remain necessary after queue reform.
A national pipeline announcement is not evidence that a named site's agreement has been accepted or that its connection date is achievable. Later methodologies and site-specific offers must be checked. This is a dated announcement; seven days is a target to check for subsequent updates.
National Energy System Operator (NESO): NESO implements electricity grid connection reforms to unlock investment in Great BritainPublished 8 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationNetwork Opportunity and Development MapNational Grid Electricity Distribution (NGED) · Source checked
Landing-page description distinguishes connected and contracted network headroom and Network Development Plan constraints and solutions at the relevant substation levels. Provides demand and generation views.
Landing page and methodology description checked; interactive map data require registration and were not extracted. Headroom is indicative, future Grid Supply Point locations may be representative, and a colour is not a capacity reservation. Covers NGED's licence areas, not the whole UK. Publisher refresh interval not established; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
National Grid Electricity Distribution (NGED): Network Opportunity and Development MapPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationNetwork Scenario Headroom Report (NSHR) demand heatmapUK Power Networks · Source checked
Official demand-heatmap landing page within UK Power Networks' open data portal. The portal links the Network Development Plan, Long Term Development Statement, infrastructure map and large-demand dashboard.
The retrieved page requires login to view datasets. No headroom value, dataset version or individual project entry was available for verification. Scenario headroom is not an offer. Covers UK Power Networks' licence areas only. Dataset refresh interval not established; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
UK Power Networks: Network Scenario Headroom Report (NSHR) demand heatmapPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationGeneration Availability and Network CapacitySSEN Distribution · Discovery only
Discovery lead for SSEN's generation availability, contracted-demand maps and headroom resources. Search-indexed descriptions identify network capability and substation information.
Direct retrieval returned HTTP 403. Current dataset version, live map content, demand values and publisher refresh interval remain unverified. Do not use indexed historical versions as current headroom. Thirty days is a proposed retry cadence.
SSEN Distribution: Generation Availability and Network CapacityPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked Unknown · Review every 30 daysThis entry identifies a source to review. Its contents have not been verified for a site assessment.
Published connection cost references
No eligible published capex reference has been recorded. Country bands remain unknown.
SpainPrepared context; site research staged · 6 source entries
Conoce la capacidad de acceso: consumidorRed Eléctrica · Source checked
Explains the transmission-demand access-capacity methodology, nodal and zonal constraints, security criteria, and treatment of power-electronic demand and synchronous compensation. These are demand sources and must be kept separate from generation access maps.
Published nodal capacity is a scenario-based network assessment, not a reservation for a site. Where synchronous compensation is included, the source requires its permissions, commissioning and effective operation. Applicable network and demand characteristics need site-specific study. Publisher update interval not established; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
Red Eléctrica: Conoce la capacidad de acceso: consumidorPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationConsulta el estado de las solicitudes: consumidorRed Eléctrica · Source checked
Official entry point for transmission-demand application and access-permit status and lists of qualifying demand applications. Use the relevant node and version when comparing applied and granted demand.
No named non-Irish site entry has been extracted in this preparation stage. An application, access permit and executed connection agreement are different evidence stages. Distribution applications need the relevant DSO source. Publisher update interval not established; seven days is PowerPlotr's review target.
Red Eléctrica: Consulta el estado de las solicitudes: consumidorPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationMapa de Capacidad de Consumoi-DE, Grupo Iberdrola · Source checked
Demand-capacity map and interpretation guidance for i-DE nodes above 1 kV. The operator states a minimum monthly update cadence and explains conditional nodes, possible reinforcement, transmission acceptability and the applicable distribution demand methodology.
Map values are informative and cannot be added across nodes or voltage levels. A site-specific study can refuse an application. A node marked 0* has no capacity in the published scenario and may require applicant-funded reinforcement. No individual node value was extracted for this registry.
i-DE, Grupo Iberdrola: Mapa de Capacidad de ConsumoPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCapacidades de acceso firme de la demanda en nodos de rede-distribución Redes Digitales · Source checked
Demand-capacity page for firm access at nodes above 1 kV, with downloadable dated files for e-distribución, EASA and Ceuta. The publisher states monthly updates using the preceding month's data. The authoritative values are the XLSX and CSV files.
Available firm-demand access is not an accepted site agreement. Capacities are not additive or simultaneous and upstream constraints need separate checks. The map was reported unavailable on the page. No dated file or site node has been selected here. Thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
e-distribución Redes Digitales: Capacidades de acceso firme de la demanda en nodos de redPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationPlanificación de redes en España: planificación nacionalRed Eléctrica · Source checked
Official national-planning entry point linking the planning process and amendments, including the July 2026 amendment. Use the approved plan and relevant project documents to identify proposed reinforcement dependencies.
Plan inclusion is not evidence that infrastructure has consent, is funded, is complete or serves a named site. A proposed planning horizon must not be described as approved without its decision. Publisher update interval not stated; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
Red Eléctrica: Planificación de redes en España: planificación nacionalPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationThird amendment to the 2021 to 2026 Electricity Transmission Network Development PlanMinisterio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (MITECO) · Source checked
Government notice confirms approval of the third targeted amendment of the 2021 to 2026 transmission plan. It provides national reinforcement context and a link to the announcement document.
The national amendment announcement is not a site connection approval, construction programme or capex rate card. Identify the exact reinforcement and its permissions before using a date. Thirty days is a target for checking later amendments, not a publisher schedule.
Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (MITECO): Third amendment to the 2021 to 2026 Electricity Transmission Network Development PlanPublished 28 July 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationPublished connection cost references
No eligible published capex reference has been recorded. Country bands remain unknown.
PolandPrepared context; site research staged · 5 source entries
Wykaz obiektów planowanych do przyłączenia do sieci przesyłowejPolskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne (PSE) · Source checked
Official directory of transmission connection applications, conditions and refusals, substations without connection capability, common procedures and aggregate TSO/DSO information. PSE states these statutory disclosures are updated at least monthly.
Application, issued conditions, executed agreement and commencement of supply are separate stages. A published condition does not prove an agreement remains valid or its securities have been met. No non-Irish record has been populated from this register.
Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne (PSE): Wykaz obiektów planowanych do przyłączenia do sieci przesyłowejPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationConnection disclosures under Article 7(8l), position at 31 August 2026Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne (PSE) · Source checked
Dated position snapshot linked by PSE's current disclosure directory. The PDF separately records import and export MW, connection location, voltage, project stage, application, conditions, refusal, agreement and supply-start dates where populated.
31 August 2026 is the stated data-position date, not a verified publication date. Empty cells remain unknown. The current directory should be checked for a replacement snapshot before using values in an assessment. A historical row cannot prove current contractual rights or available network headroom.
Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne (PSE): Connection disclosures under Article 7(8l), position at 31 August 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationPodmioty ubiegające się o przyłączenieTAURON Dystrybucja · Source checked
Official DSO directory for applicants above 1 kV, linking a disclosure of planned connections and refusals labelled 31 August 2026. Provides a representative regional source alongside PSE.
Landing page and dated-file listing checked; individual file rows have not been reviewed. TAURON's territory is not the whole Polish distribution network. Publisher refresh interval not independently established here; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
TAURON Dystrybucja: Podmioty ubiegające się o przyłączeniePublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationPrzyłączenie do sieci: pytania i odpowiedziTAURON Dystrybucja · Source checked
Official connection-process guidance includes deadlines and exclusions for issuing connection conditions. Useful for checking which administrative step a reported programme actually describes.
Time allowed to issue conditions is not time to energisation. No construction-duration input has been adopted. Applicable customer group, complete application and current legislation must be checked. Publisher update interval not established; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
TAURON Dystrybucja: Przyłączenie do sieci: pytania i odpowiedziPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationInformacje o przyłączeniachEnea Operator · Discovery only
Discovery lead for the DSO's statutory application, conditions and refusal disclosures above 1 kV.
Official-domain result was located but direct retrieval failed with HTTP 502. Current canonical URL, file date, completeness and live disclosure content remain unverified. Do not use this entry as site evidence. Thirty days is a proposed retry cadence.
Enea Operator: Informacje o przyłączeniachPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked Unknown · Review every 30 daysThis entry identifies a source to review. Its contents have not been verified for a site assessment.
Published connection cost references
No eligible published capex reference has been recorded. Country bands remain unknown.
NetherlandsPrepared context; site research staged · 3 source entries
Capaciteitskaart elektriciteitsnet: regionale netbeheerders, afnameNetbeheer Nederland and participating network operators · Source checked
Official regional-network demand map provides distinct capacity and queue-status categories and links to the TenneT and combined views. Demand (afname) must be assessed separately from export (teruglevering).
Map shell and legend verified. The interactive data layer reported an error, so no postcode, substation capacity, queue value or reinforcement date was captured. Regional colour alone cannot establish available site import or a contractual right. Publisher cadence is documented separately in the map-methodology entry.
Netbeheer Nederland and participating network operators: Capaciteitskaart elektriciteitsnet: regionale netbeheerders, afnamePublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCapaciteitskaart elektriciteitsnet: TenneT, afnameTenneT via Netbeheer Nederland · Source checked
Official TenneT transmission-demand layer of the national capacity map. The separate TSO layer allows upstream congestion to be checked alongside a regional DSO view.
Layer URL and legend verified; map data reported an error and no area-specific conclusion was taken. An upstream network constraint must not be inferred solely from a DSO colour. No site allocation or connection date is established. Publisher cadence is documented separately in the map-methodology entry.
TenneT via Netbeheer Nederland: Capaciteitskaart elektriciteitsnet: TenneT, afnamePublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCapacity-map update: planned grid extensions and the transmission networkNetbeheer Nederland · Source checked
Explains combined, TenneT and regional layers; postcode lookup; planned reinforcement and target commissioning dates. States capacity information is renewed at least quarterly, more often for material developments, and queue information monthly.
The map does not disclose individual company applications. Planned reinforcement dates are target dates, not site energisation commitments. This dated methodology should be checked for later changes; thirty days is PowerPlotr's review target.
Netbeheer Nederland: Capacity-map update: planned grid extensions and the transmission networkPublished 11 November 2024 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationPublished connection cost references
No eligible published capex reference has been recorded. Country bands remain unknown.
DenmarkPrepared context; site research staged · 4 source entries
Energinet introduces a temporary pause in new connection agreementsEnerginet, official press release via Via Ritzau · Source checked
Historical operator notice paused new transmission connection agreements and lengthened screening and maturation processing. It explicitly excludes projects with an already concluded connection agreement. The initial period was three months or until an overview and additional measures were in place.
This was not a blanket cancellation of all Danish grid connections. Read with the May transition notice and October update below. It cannot establish the treatment of any particular site, DSO application or agreement. Seven days is PowerPlotr's target to check subsequent notices.
Energinet, official press release via Via Ritzau: Energinet introduces a temporary pause in new connection agreementsPublished 2 March 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationNew model for larger connections and agreements after the temporary pauseEnerginet, official press release via Via Ritzau · Source checked
Operator notice says the initial pause ends after 3 June, with larger projects moving to pooled assessment using maturity, progress and network-friendly criteria. New agreements were not expected before autumn. Smaller and medium DSO customers could continue connecting in many places; larger DSO requests needed upstream clarification.
October's later notice gives the next stated allocation milestone. No site-specific capacity, execution date or energisation window is established. The general discussion of five to ten years for some very large connections is not a universal process duration and has not been adopted as a site-model input. Seven days is a review target.
Energinet, official press release via Via Ritzau: New model for larger connections and agreements after the temporary pausePublished 27 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationRegulator approval of Energinet customer maturity and progress requirementsEnerginet, official press release via Via Ritzau · Source checked
Latest operator status checked before the assessment date. Energinet reports regulator approval of maturity and progress criteria and expects the first pooled capacity allocation in November 2026. The release links the regulator's decision.
A planned November allocation is not an award, signed connection agreement or energisation. Individual capacity and agreement status remain unknown without project evidence. The legal text linked from the release was not readable in this retrieval; see the discovery entry. Seven days is PowerPlotr's review target, not a fixed operator publication cadence.
Energinet, official press release via Via Ritzau: Regulator approval of Energinet customer maturity and progress requirementsPublished 16 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationForsyningstilsynet decision linked by Energinet on 16 October 2026Forsyningstilsynet · Discovery only
Official decision endpoint linked by Energinet's October status notice. Retained for legal-text review before assigning any site-level policy-compliance conclusion.
Endpoint returned no readable decision text. Exact decision date, conditions, effective scope and exceptions have not been independently checked. Do not treat the operator's summary as a reviewed legal determination for a named site. Seven days is a proposed retry cadence.
Forsyningstilsynet: Forsyningstilsynet decision linked by Energinet on 16 October 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked Unknown · Review every 7 daysThis entry identifies a source to review. Its contents have not been verified for a site assessment.
Published connection cost references
No eligible published capex reference has been recorded. Country bands remain unknown.
APPLY THE METHOD
Read European grid positions with confidence.
The planned half-day online Masterclass works through capacity ladders, conflicting power claims, policy exposure, energisation dependencies and connection capex evidence. €1,500 per seat or €12,000 per firm, excluding VAT.
Dates and bookings are not yet open. Register interest to hear when a session is available.
View the syllabus and register interestOPPORTUNITY SCORE
Five factors, with evidence first
Model scenario-fit-v1. Each sourced analyst rating is 0–4; its weighted contribution is rating ÷ 4 × weight. A missing rating stays unknown.
Scoped import evidence, deliverability, time to power and connection dependencies.
Development control, usable footprint, access and evidenced acquisition constraints.
Site handoff, contractual access and physical route evidence, including unresolved diversity.
Parcel zoning, permission, conditions, appeals and environmental constraints.
Workload, geography and delivery-window evidence. Allocated capacity is not an open requirement.
CONNECTED SIGNALS
Demand evidence is separate from an available requirement.
The intelligence register separates confirmed observations, probable interpretations, estimates, rumours and unknowns. Confidence describes the observation, not the chance that a development happens. Allocated contracts, unresolved remaining demand and paused plans retain their own commercial status.
Signals are grouped by an evidenced company, campus or location relationship. A campus connection does not transfer a tenant or capacity figure to another building. Event dates, source dates and actual research review dates remain separate.
Explore demand and infrastructure signalsOPPORTUNITY TAXONOMY
Do not confuse “found” with “for sale.”
Origin, market exposure, verification and cloud-region alignment answer different questions. They remain visible on every dossier.
How the record entered the pipeline.
What is known about its current market posture.
The highest present support for the material claim.
A region-level screen using provider-published locations. Exact availability-zone facility boundaries are not public, so parcel inclusion remains unverified unless directly evidenced.
EVIDENCE WORKFLOW
From signal to a defensible lead
- 01Detect
Identify closure, planning, grid, land and infrastructure signals.
- 02Resolve
Establish the parcel, ownership route and actual developable area.
- 03Verify
Separate confirmed facts from inference and close the critical gaps.
- 04Rank
Assess a stated scenario only after the evidence gates pass; expose unresolved trade-offs.
