DTCP-backed development acquired through Atlantic Hub in 2024. GreenScale reports 119,000 m² acquired near Foyle Port; the registered land-owning SPV remains unverified. RRY11 is the initial phase, included…
Read overviewGreenScale Derry — RRY10 campus (formerly Atlantic Hub)
Foyle Port Innovation Park, Maydown, Derry, United Kingdom
Watch this site
Watch GreenScale Derry — RRY10 campus (formerly Atlantic Hub)
Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.
8 cited sources · 5 utility and planning categories reviewed.
Review evidence and gapsReview connection agreement, contracted milestones and energisation evidence.
Open the full checkOverview
DTCP-backed development acquired through Atlantic Hub in 2024. GreenScale reports 119,000 m² acquired near Foyle Port; the registered land-owning SPV remains unverified. RRY11 is the initial phase, included here rather than counted again.
- Developer / applicant
- GreenScale
- Owner
- Not verified
- Operator
- GreenScale (intended)
Planning and delivery status
Developer confirms early construction, including clearance and roads, with TSL. This stage describes enabling works; the current 2028 ready-for-service date remains a target.
Stage source: 7 Aug 2025Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.
POWER STUDY
Power
What the power evidence establishes
The site-specific connection scope has not been established for this record.
No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.
The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.
Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. This record has not received a complete power study review.
Read the rules and verification levelsCapacity ladder and evidence
Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.
Applied
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?Offered
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?Accepted / contracted
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?Energised
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?Conflicts and scope comparisons
No conflicting pair is recorded. This does not establish that all public statements have been reconciled.
United Kingdom grid context
Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.
No country context entries have been linked to this site. Applicable policy, capacity information and reinforcement dependencies need review.
Country coverage: prepared sources; site-level research not extended. View all country sources and refresh schedules.
Derived energisation window
The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.
Rule
Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Dependencies driving the range
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
- Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme: unknown.
What the earliest case requires
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
Missing inputs leave the range open
- A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
- An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
- Grid-works planning status and programme
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
Indicative HV and connection capex
Unknown
Rule and scope
Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Scope questions
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
- Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
Alternatives and policy exposure
Behind-the-meter generation
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?Battery storage
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?Private wire
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?Gas
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?Connection claim against current policy
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?Open questions for a Reality Check
Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.
60 questions to resolve
- Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?
Verification has not been established.
- What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?
Verification has not been established.
- What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?
Verification has not been established.
- What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?
Verification has not been established.
- What connection agreement type and current status are documented?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What on-site generation obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What securities are required, posted and still valid?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published IT load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published facility load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published import capacity in MVA?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What operator-published connection-to-energisation duration applies to this site and connection stage?
An application-to-offer processing target is not an energisation duration.
- Which reinforcements does the connection depend on, and what dates are published?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which grid works require planning, and what is their current consent status and dated programme?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which connection-policy conditions apply, and when could they be satisfied?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which checked country-grid sources and location-specific constraints apply to this connection?
No country-context relationship has been established for this record.
- Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.
Request a Reality CheckEarlier capacity notes and source context
Campus grid connections reported as secured by GreenScale; not commissioned IT load. Proposed expansion to 300+ MW is separate.
Published claimProject source recordDeveloper reports 100 MW grid connections secured; underlying utility agreement and energisation not reviewed. Future 300 MW expansion excluded.
IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.
Planning & utilities
5 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.
Planning & decisions
Partial evidenceReleased DAERA records link the first-building reserved-matters case LA11/2023/1729/RM to Condition 2 discharge application LA11/2025/0037/DC. After earlier objections and revisions, Water Management Unit was content to discharge the final CEMP condition on 13 June 2025. This consultee position does not itself establish the council discharge order or discharge of every condition.
Sources & next check
Grid & import rights
Partial evidenceDeveloper reports 100 MW grid connections secured; underlying utility agreement and energisation not reviewed. Future 300 MW expansion excluded.
Sources & next check
Flood, ground & environment
Partial evidenceThe council’s connection-route response identifies nearby historic lime/tar remediation under LA11/2021/0909/F and LA11/2016/0229/F. Its study area is a proposed cable/BESS corridor near Coolkeeragh, not proof of contamination across the data-centre footprint. Construction pollution controls also underwent the 2025 CEMP review.
Sources & next check
Water, cooling & heat
Partial evidenceDAERA’s released consultation raised Culmore 2 wastewater-treatment/sewer capacity and required NI Water agreement or a separate discharge consent where appropriate. The file identifies wastewater dependencies; it does not verify a present cooling-water allocation.
Sources & next check
Programme & delivery
Partial evidenceGreenScale’s 7 August 2025 update confirms TSL-linked early works including clearance and roads. Existing construction stage/date retained; main building completion remains future.
Sources & next check
Not assessed
Evidence still needed
- Land-use zoning
The site boundary has not been matched to the current adopted zoning map and data-centre use policy.
- Fibre & dark fibre
No verified site entry, dark-fibre offer or physically diverse route assessment is recorded. Regional coverage alone is insufficient.
- Ownership & development control
Legal title, land-owning entity, development-control route and restrictions need verification. A named developer does not establish availability.
- Land, footprint & access
Gross and net developable area, boundaries, access rights, easements, setbacks and expansion space need site-specific evidence.
- Demand & location fit
Customer geography, latency, cloud or exchange nodes and a supported use case need project-specific evidence; national growth alone is insufficient.
Project team
Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.
Main contractor
Construction partner for RRY10; developer confirms site preparation, clearance and roads in August 2025. Future full-campus contract scope not stated.
Appointment sourceEngineering consultant
Initial RRY11 phase: design management, MEP, ICT, security, embodied carbon and LEED services, per consultant's project statement.
Appointment sourceSpecialists & vendors
Planning strategy and application coordination for GreenScale’s Foyle Port development.
Appointment sourceCo-author of the June 2023 construction environmental management plan for LA11/2023/1729/RM, as identified by NIEA; not a GC appointment.
Appointment sourceCo-author of the June 2023 construction environmental management plan for LA11/2023/1729/RM, as identified by NIEA; not a GC appointment.
Appointment sourceUnlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.
Sources
Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.
- GreenScale — Derry campus power, location and programmegreenscaledc.com · Publication date unstated
- GreenScale — TSL construction partnership and works underwaygreenscaledc.com · 7 Aug 2025
- Ethos — RRY11 project serviceslinkedin.com · Publication date unstated
- DTCP — GreenScale launch and Atlantic Hub acquisitiondtcp.capital · 12 Nov 2024
- DAERA: released Condition 2 consultation history, LA11/2025/0037/DCdaera-ni.gov.uk · 10 Apr 2026
- MCI Planning: GreenScale Foyle Port projectmciplanning.com · Publication date unstated
- DAERA: Atlantic Hub planning consultation records, Annex Adaera-ni.gov.uk · 9 Apr 2026
- Derry and Strabane: EIR 6083, Atlantic Hub connection ground-condition studyderrystrabane.com · 26 Nov 2025
Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.
