Phased FIN04 development with distinct municipal permits and power routes. The campus figure must not be assigned to individual buildings; original land acquisition, later planning areas and advertised campus…
Read overviewatNorth FIN04 campus
Myllykoski / Kouvola, Finland
Watch this site
Watch atNorth FIN04 campus
Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.
9 cited sources · 8 utility and planning categories reviewed.
Review evidence and gapsObtain phase-specific network agreements and energisation milestones; verify permanent and temporary routes separately.
Open the full checkOverview
Phased FIN04 development with distinct municipal permits and power routes. The campus figure must not be assigned to individual buildings; original land acquisition, later planning areas and advertised campus area differ in scope.
- Developer / applicant
- atNorth
- Owner
- Not verified
- Operator
- atNorth
Planning and delivery status
YIT's July release announced immediate construction; its August release adds FIN04A1. End-2027 completion in the July contract is a target for that facility, not confirmation of the whole campus.
Stage source: 28 Aug 2026Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.
POWER STUDY
Power
What the power evidence establishes
The site-specific connection scope has not been established for this record.
Power classDNo qualifying rung
No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.
The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.
Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. This record has not received a complete power study review.
Read the rules and verification levels01
Capacity ladder and evidence
Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.
01
Applied
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?02
Offered
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?03
Accepted / contracted
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?04
Energised
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?02
Conflicts and scope comparisons
No conflicting pair is recorded. This does not establish that all public statements have been reconciled.
03
Finland grid context
Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.
No country context entries have been linked to this site. Applicable policy, capacity information and reinforcement dependencies need review.
04
Derived energisation window
Earliest plausible yearUnknown
Latest plausible yearUnknown
The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.
Rule
Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Dependencies driving the range
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
- Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme: unknown.
What the earliest case requires
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
Missing inputs leave the range open
- A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
- An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
- Grid-works planning status and programme
- Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
05
Indicative HV and connection capex
Unknown
Rule and scope
Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Scope questions
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
- Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
06
Alternatives and policy exposure
Behind-the-meter generation
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?Battery storage
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?Private wire
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?Gas
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?Planning / policy requirement
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?Connection claim against current policy
Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?07
Open questions for a Reality Check
Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.
60 questions to resolve
- Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?
Verification has not been established.
- What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?
Verification has not been established.
- What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?
Verification has not been established.
- What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?
Verification has not been established.
- What connection agreement type and current status are documented?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What on-site generation obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What securities are required, posted and still valid?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published IT load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published facility load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What is the published import capacity in MVA?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What operator-published connection-to-energisation duration applies to this site and connection stage?
An application-to-offer processing target is not an energisation duration.
- Which reinforcements does the connection depend on, and what dates are published?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which grid works require planning, and what is their current consent status and dated programme?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which connection-policy conditions apply, and when could they be satisfied?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
- Which checked country-grid sources and location-specific constraints apply to this connection?
No country-context relationship has been established for this record.
- Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
Use these questions to scope a Power Reality Check.
Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.
Request a Reality CheckEarlier capacity notes and source context
430 MW unspecifiedProject capacity
Planned total FIN04 campus capacity in the July YIT announcement; not the capacity of either individual YIT contract.
Published claimProject source recordImport rights and connection evidence
The June EIA record identifies FIN04A Ph2 supply via Fingrid Lemmesaari and the planned 110 kV Emmanmäki GIS. FIN04B has a planned Tuomijoki–Koria route targeted for 2027; temporary supply uses Yrjölänmäki. These are project routes, not published import entitlements.
IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.
Planning & utilities
8 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.
Planning & decisions
Partial evidenceKouvola confirms permit 286-2025-384 for three data-centre buildings at Lossitie 19, parcel 286-423-20-2, was granted on 11 February 2026 and is final. A separate 2 June permit 286-2026-178 concerns Lossitie 26, parcel 286-423-20-1.
Sources & next check
Land-use zoning
DocumentedThe city’s May statement confirms the Lossitie 19 project is within the 1985 TT industrial zone, reviewed as current in 2023. Separately, Lossitie plan 35/003 became final on 9 March 2026 without appeal.
Sources & next check
Grid & import rights
Partial evidenceThe June EIA record identifies FIN04A Ph2 supply via Fingrid Lemmesaari and the planned 110 kV Emmanmäki GIS. FIN04B has a planned Tuomijoki–Koria route targeted for 2027; temporary supply uses Yrjölänmäki. These are project routes, not published import entitlements.
Sources & next check
Ownership & development control
Partial evidenceSeller Redeve reports a 21-hectare sale to atNorth under a 4 December 2023 agreement. This is transaction evidence; it does not identify the present registered landholding entity for every FIN04 expansion parcel.
Sources & next check
Land, footprint & access
Partial evidenceThe Lossitie 26 permit records a 357,961 m² property and 93,000 m² planning floor-area entitlement. The current operator advertises a 65-hectare campus. These are different boundaries, not interchangeable net developable areas.
Sources & next check
Flood, ground & environment
Partial evidenceThe 17 June decision finds full EIA unnecessary for FIN04A Ph2, subject to reassessment if the project changes. The building permit requires acoustic compliance evidence before final inspection and controls for stormwater and riverbank vegetation.
Sources & next check
Water, cooling & heat
Partial evidenceFIN04A Ph2’s EIA record describes closed-loop liquid cooling and municipal water/sewer connection, with heat-recovery infrastructure planned. It does not prove current heat offtake or commissioned recovery.
Sources & next check
Programme & delivery
Partial evidenceYIT’s July 2026 contract starts immediately with an end-2027 completion target for its facility. The undated operator page still advertises H1 2026 readiness; neither statement establishes completion of the whole campus.
Sources & next check
Not assessed
Fibre & dark fibreDemand & location fit
Evidence still needed
- Fibre & dark fibre
No verified site entry, dark-fibre offer or physically diverse route assessment is recorded. Regional coverage alone is insufficient.
- Demand & location fit
Customer geography, latency, cloud or exchange nodes and a supported use case need project-specific evidence; national growth alone is insufficient.
Project team
Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.
Main contractor
July facility: design-build, CSA, MEP and commissioning. August FIN04A1 award: main contractor including MEP.
Appointment sourceUnlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.
Sources
Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.
- YIT: FIN04 design-build agreement and immediate constructionyitgroup.com · 21 Jul 2026
- YIT: additional FIN04A1 construction agreementyitgroup.com · 28 Aug 2026
- Kouvola — construction permit 286-2025-384, decision 11 February 2026kouvola.fi · 11 Feb 2026
- Kouvola — planning statement §109 confirming permit finalityep10.kouvola.fi · 13 May 2026
- Kouvola — construction permit 286-2026-178, Lossitie 26ep10.kouvola.fi · 2 Jun 2026
- Kouvola — Lossitie plan 35/003, updated 23 March 2026kouvola.fi · 23 Mar 2026
- Finnish Licensing and Supervision Agency — FIN04A Ph2 EIA screening LVV-U/59003/2026ymparisto.fi · 17 Jun 2026
- Redeve — sale of 21-hectare Myllykoski area to atNorthredeve.fi · 7 Dec 2023
- atNorth — FIN04 current campus profileatnorth.com · Publication date unstated
Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.