Skip to content
Reality Check
Menu
Operating

Digital Realty Paris Digital Park

La Courneuve, Paris, France

Reviewed 28 Sept 20269 sources
Watch this site

Watch Digital Realty Paris Digital Park

Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.

Fields marked * are required.

Checking enquiry availability…

Request details

Register your interest in monitoring this record. Alerts are not active yet. Site Watch will cost €150 per site per month excluding VAT after any included trial.

Optional. Public information only. Do not include confidential or non-public information.

Project brief

Four-building PAR8–PAR11 campus with completed construction and current operating evidence. Team appointments distinguish PAR8 envelope/ground studies from PAR10/PAR11 fire protection.

Read overview
Next check

Reconcile as-built connections and phase demand rights with the 76 MW IT design total.

Open the full check

Overview

Four-building PAR8–PAR11 campus with completed construction and current operating evidence. Team appointments distinguish PAR8 envelope/ground studies from PAR10/PAR11 fire protection.

Developer / applicant
Digital Realty
Owner
Not verified
Operator
Digital Realty

Planning and delivery status

Current undated PAR11 service listing and a May 2026 supplier account support campus operation following Mercury’s October 2025 handover. The 76 MW design total does not establish live or available capacity in every building.

Stage source: Publication date unstated

Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.

POWER STUDY

Power

What the power evidence establishes

The site-specific connection scope has not been established for this record.

Power classDNo qualifying rung

No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.

The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.

Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. This record has not received a complete power study review.

Read the rules and verification levels
01

Capacity ladder and evidence

Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.

01

Applied

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Event date
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?
Verification
Unknown
02

Offered

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Event date
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?
Verification
Unknown
03

Accepted / contracted

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Event date
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?
Verification
Unknown
04

Energised

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Event date
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?
Verification
Unknown
Connection point and load boundaries
Network operator
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?
Connection point
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?
Voltage
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?
Straight-line distance
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?
Published route length
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?

IT load

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published IT load in MW?
Basis
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?
Site / phase boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?

Facility load

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published facility load in MW?
Basis
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?
Site / phase boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?

Import capacity

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published import capacity in MVA?
Basis
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?
Site / phase boundary
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?

These are different electrical quantities. No power factor, PUE or available import is assumed from an IT-load statement.

Connection agreement and conditions
Agreement type
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What connection agreement type and current status are documented?
Phased capacity
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?
Flexibility obligations
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?
On-site generation obligations
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What on-site generation obligations apply?
Securities posted
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What securities are required, posted and still valid?
Longstop dates
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?
02

Conflicts and scope comparisons

No conflicting pair is recorded. This does not establish that all public statements have been reconciled.

03

France grid context

Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.

No country context entries have been linked to this site. Applicable policy, capacity information and reinforcement dependencies need review.

04

Derived energisation window

Earliest plausible yearUnknown
Latest plausible yearUnknown

The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.

Rule

Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.

No observed inputs establish this result.

Dependencies driving the range

  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
  • Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
  • Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme: unknown.

What the earliest case requires

  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
  • Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
  • Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.

Missing inputs leave the range open

  • A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
  • An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
  • Grid-works planning status and programme
  • Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
05

Indicative HV and connection capex

Unknown

Rule and scope

Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.

No observed inputs establish this result.

Published connection works scope
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?
Scope completeness
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?

Scope questions

  • Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
  • Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
  • Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
06

Alternatives and policy exposure

Behind-the-meter generation

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?

Battery storage

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?

Private wire

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?

Gas

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?

Connection claim against current policy

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?
07

Open questions for a Reality Check

Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.

60 questions to resolve
  1. Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  2. What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  3. What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  4. What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  5. What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  6. What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  7. What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  8. Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  9. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?

    Verification has not been established.

  10. What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  11. What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  12. Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  13. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?

    Verification has not been established.

  14. What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  15. What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  16. Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  17. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?

    Verification has not been established.

  18. What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  19. What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  20. Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  21. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?

    Verification has not been established.

  22. What connection agreement type and current status are documented?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  23. Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  24. What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  25. What on-site generation obligations apply?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  26. What securities are required, posted and still valid?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  27. What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  28. What is the published IT load in MW?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  29. On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  30. Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  31. What is the published facility load in MW?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  32. On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  33. Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  34. What is the published import capacity in MVA?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  35. On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  36. Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  37. What operator-published connection-to-energisation duration applies to this site and connection stage?

    An application-to-offer processing target is not an energisation duration.

  38. Which reinforcements does the connection depend on, and what dates are published?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  39. Which grid works require planning, and what is their current consent status and dated programme?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  40. Which connection-policy conditions apply, and when could they be satisfied?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  41. What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  42. Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  43. What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  44. Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  45. What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  46. Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  47. What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  48. Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  49. What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  50. Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  51. Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?

    Not established from the public records reviewed.

  52. Which checked country-grid sources and location-specific constraints apply to this connection?

    No country-context relationship has been established for this record.

  53. Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.

    Connection-cost scope question.

  54. Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  55. Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  56. Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  57. Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  58. Resolve the energisation input: Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  59. Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.

    This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.

  60. Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.

    This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.

Use these questions to scope a Power Reality Check.

Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.

Request a Reality Check
Earlier capacity notes and source context
76 MW ITProject capacity

Combined PAR8, PAR9, PAR10 and PAR11 campus design IT capacity; no available-capacity or MVA inference.

Published claimProject source record
Import rights and connection evidence

The historic design separated western-building Enedis connections from the RTE-fed eastern pair. This establishes a proposed network arrangement, not present contracted import.

IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.

Planning & utilities

7 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.

Planning & decisions

Partial evidence

DRIEAT identifies the 24 September 2021 authorisation for INTERXION France’s four buildings PAR8–PAR11 at 2 avenue Marcel Cachin, AIOT 0006523747. Géorisques records authorised operation and a later inspection on 21 May 2026. This campus is distinct from PAR7 at rue du Rateau, AIOT 0006514850.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 28 Sept 2026

Next check

Read the full 2021 order and later amendments, then the 21 May 2026 inspection; confirm building-specific conditions and appeal status.

Land-use zoning

Partial evidence

The 2018 impact study locates the scheme in zone UE and identifies infrastructure servitudes. It predates the current planning framework.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 27 Sept 2026

Next check

Check the adopted PLUi and current servitudes against the completed campus boundary.

Grid & import rights

Partial evidence

The historic design separated western-building Enedis connections from the RTE-fed eastern pair. This establishes a proposed network arrangement, not present contracted import.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 27 Sept 2026

Next check

Reconcile as-built connections and phase demand rights with the 76 MW IT design total.

Land, footprint & access

Partial evidence

Mercury identifies about 39,000 m² of technical space and a 7,500 m² public park. These are functional areas, not a verified developable land boundary.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 27 Sept 2026

Next check

Reconcile campus parcels, public-park obligations and retained expansion space.

Flood, ground & environment

Partial evidence

The 2018 study records contamination/remediation risks. The May 2025 DRIEAT inspection proposed corrective action on generator records, acoustic evidence, electrical isolation and emergency provisions. These were inspection findings, not proof of ongoing breach or a new refusal; closure remains unchecked.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 28 Sept 2026

Next check

Reconcile the 2025 actions with the May 2026 report and prefectural follow-up; obtain remediation completion validation and residual land restrictions.

Water, cooling & heat

Partial evidence

The 2025 inspection quotes the consent’s public-potable-water supply and monthly metering duties; it requested improved records of dry and adiabatic cooling operating hours. Contractor descriptions of hybrid/free cooling do not establish compliance or current water headroom.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 28 Sept 2026

Next check

Verify closure in the 2026 inspection, metered consumption and the applicable temperature-dependent cooling conditions.

Programme & delivery

Partial evidence

DRIEAT found PAR8–PAR10 operating in May 2025 and records PAR10 delivery on 19 December 2024; its then-target for all four was 2027. Mercury’s 2020–2025 campus period and the 2026 PAR10/PAR11 fire-protection reference describe other milestones.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 28 Sept 2026

Next check

Reconcile PAR11 handover/operation with the 2026 inspection and operator acceptance; retain the differing historic forecasts.

Not assessed

Fibre & dark fibreOwnership & development controlDemand & location fit
Evidence still needed
  • Fibre & dark fibre

    No verified site entry, dark-fibre offer or physically diverse route assessment is recorded. Regional coverage alone is insufficient.

  • Ownership & development control

    Legal title, land-owning entity, development-control route and restrictions need verification. A named developer does not establish availability.

  • Demand & location fit

    Customer geography, latency, cloud or exchange nodes and a supported use case need project-specific evidence; national growth alone is insufficient.

Project team

Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.

Main contractor

Campus delivery including shell/core, architectural envelope, roof, MEP and architectural fit-out, modular plant and site infrastructure.

Appointment source

Architect

Engineering consultant

Specialists & vendors

Unlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.

Sources

Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.

  1. Mercury: PAR11 and Paris Digital Park handovermercuryeng.com · 21 Oct 2025
  2. Mercury: appointed campus expansion contractormercuryeng.com · 9 Apr 2024
  3. Mercury: Paris Digital Park portfoliomercuryeng.com · Publication date unstated
  4. Arcora: PAR8 envelope engineeringarcora.com · Publication date unstated
  5. VID FIREKILL: PAR10/PAR11 fire-protection deliveryvidfirekill.com · 15 May 2026
  6. Digital Realty: PAR11 facilitydigitalrealty.com · Publication date unstated
  7. La Courneuve: PAR8 environmental impact study, revision 1lacourneuve.fr · 26 Oct 2018
  8. DRIEAT: Paris Digital Park inspection of 23 May 2025, AIOT 0006523747georisques.gouv.fr · 23 May 2025
  9. Géorisques: INTERXION France, 2 avenue Marcel Cachin, establishment 0006523747georisques.gouv.fr · Publication date unstated

Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.