Refused data centre proposal on 10.58 hectares south of the former Asahi complex. Distinct from the earlier MSN Partnership warehouse conversion. Grid capacity and renewable supply evidence did not satisfy ACP.
Read overviewAVAIO Orion / Mayo Data Hub — Killala
Killala, County Mayo, Ireland
Watch this site
Watch AVAIO Orion / Mayo Data Hub — Killala
Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.
11 cited sources · 8 utility and planning categories reviewed.
Review evidence and gapsMonitor ACP case and Mayo register for a revised application or judicial-review outcome; do not assume a challenge has been filed.
Open the full checkOverview
Refused data centre proposal on 10.58 hectares south of the former Asahi complex. Distinct from the earlier MSN Partnership warehouse conversion. Grid capacity and renewable supply evidence did not satisfy ACP.
- Developer / applicant
- Mayo Data Hub Limited / AVAIO Digital
- Owner
- Mayo County Council (landowner recorded in planning application; current title unverified)
- Operator
- Not verified
Planning and delivery status
ACP refused permission on 15 September 2026 (PL16.322575; council 2460708), superseding the council's 25 April 2025 decision to grant. Proposed scheme; no verified construction.
Stage source: 15 Sept 2026Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.
POWER STUDY
Power
What the power evidence establishes
Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme
No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.
The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.
Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. Evidence reviewed 19 October 2026.
Read the rules and verification levelsCapacity ladder and evidence
Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.
Applied
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What applied import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?Offered
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?Accepted / contracted
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?Energised
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?Conflicts and scope comparisons
IT, average facility demand and maximum-import claim use different bases
The three figures describe different quantities. They are retained without assuming PUE, power factor or a contracted MVA entitlement.
Nominal IT capacity
MW IT design capacity.
Approximate average electrical demand
MW average facility demand.
Applicant maximum-import description
MW in the source, not MVA.
Resolution
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Obtain the operator application and approved load schedule with import MVA, peak facility MW and design power factor.Published proposed generator output is described as both 75 MW and 73 MW
Design descriptions differ. Neither establishes de-rated market-qualified dispatchable output or its delivery date.
Original inspector report
MW output in proposed development description.
Additional inspector report
- An Coimisiun PleanalaPublished 14 August 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
MW output in later assessment.
Resolution
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Which approved generator schedule reconciles gross output, de-rated output and wholesale-market availability?Ireland grid context
Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.
CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Connection policy for new data centre applications, including matching dispatchable generation or storage, additional renewable electricity and network location assessment. At least 80% of annual demand must be met by additional renewable electricity generated in the Republic of Ireland, with a six-year glide path from energisation. Requirements and transitional scope must be checked against the actual application date and connection position.
A policy requirement is not evidence that a particular site has complied or has connection rights. Onsite or proximate generation is permitted; onsite-only generation is not a universal requirement. Do not retrospectively apply the new application rules to an earlier agreement without checking transitional scope. No fixed publisher update cadence is stated; PowerPlotr proposes a weekly policy check.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionPublished 12 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3EirGrid · Source checked
Implements CRU/2025236. For new transmission data centres at or above 10 MVA, nominated dispatchable generation or storage must match MIC after applicable de-rating and be delivered before energisation or demand ramp-up. Nominated generation is separately connected and metered and participates in the SEM. The stated offer-processing periods are approximately 7.5 calendar months where nominated generation and renewables already have offers, or up to 18 months where associated generation has newly applied through ECP-GSS.
These are conditional application-to-offer periods, not construction or energisation durations, and are excluded from energisation calculations. A complete application, linked generation status and fees matter. An offer is not an accepted agreement. Earlier applications can remain under CRU/21/124. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Technical AssessmentEirGrid · Source checked
Explains application-specific assessment of capacity, voltage, system stability, short-circuit effects and outages. Continuous demand above 50 MW is significant for the Irish 110 kV network and should focus on connection voltages above 110 kV. Dedicated loop-in connections are difficult to integrate and require wider system benefit.
General technical context cannot establish a connection point, headroom or capacity allocation for a particular site. Every proposal still requires operator assessment. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is monthly and after a related policy decision.
EirGrid: Data Centre Technical AssessmentPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationData Centre Constrained Area OverviewEirGrid · Source checked
Pages 11 to 12 identify high-level potential on the 220 kV network around Galway, Limerick and Cork, subject to individual assessment and policy compliance. The overview considers greater Dublin fully constrained for new data centre development. It advises a prudent mid-2030s assumption for new connections in the identified areas because of work and outage programmes.
Regional opportunity is not site-specific capacity or a contractual right. Mid-2030s is qualitative operator context, not a bounded energisation window or a promised 2035 date. Earlier applications and agreements require their own transitional-policy check. Detailed heat maps are planned through the 2027 Ten Year Transmission Forecast Statement. No recurring publisher cadence is specified; proposed review is monthly.
EirGrid: Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationCRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked
Approves fault ride-through, rate of change of frequency and active power recovery requirements for existing and future transmission-connected demand facilities. The technical requirements include remaining connected within the specified voltage profile, withstanding plus or minus 1 Hz/s and recovering 90% of pre-fault active power within 500 milliseconds after fault clearance and voltage recovery to 0.9 per unit. Compliance is assessed at the point of connection.
The associated Grid Code amendment takes effect on 27 October 2026. This is a separate technical requirement from the December 2025 connection policy. Site compliance, an approved derogation and any demand utilisation restriction need direct evidence. Missing public compliance evidence means unverified, not automatically non-compliant. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkPublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationMPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective dateCommission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid · Source checked
The CRU directs EirGrid to amend the Grid Code five weeks after the 22 September 2026 decision. EirGrid's Grid Code Modifications register labels this approval effective 27 October 2026. The letter applies the technical requirements to all transmission-connected demand facilities.
The effective date does not itself prove compliance or an energisation entitlement at any site. Review the decision, current Grid Code and any approved derogation together. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is weekly through implementation.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid: MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective datePublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAvailability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026ESB Networks · Source checked
Indicates available transformer capacity for demand and generation at distribution substations. The download is labelled July 2026, but station capacity and demand contracts and offers are dated to Q4 2025, with 2024/2025 load readings. The publisher's stated objective is quarterly map updates. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for a replacement file and records the underlying data date separately from its label.
Transformer headroom is not guaranteed upstream network capacity, a connection offer, or site rights. HV locations are indicative. ESB's 6 to 9 month minor-works and approximately 2 to 3 year significant-station-work examples concern MV connections up to 10 MVA under stated conditions; they are not valid timing inputs for large transmission-connected pilots.
ESB Networks: Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDistribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025ESB Networks · Source checked
The DNDP identifies distribution investment and flexibility needs. Its Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025 provides indicative headroom at existing 110 kV and 38 kV substations under four growth scenarios, with annual forecasts to 2030 and five-year intervals to 2050. The publisher says capacity workbooks update annually and network development plans every two years. Proposed PowerPlotr review is monthly.
Workbook headroom does not establish upstream feeder or transmission capacity, final site connections or rights. Future headroom can depend on planned reinforcement; verify the specific project's delivery and consent status. The checked landing page identifies and explains the workbooks; workbook cells have not been imported into the pilot.
ESB Networks: Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationTransmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerEirGrid · Source checked
The checked regulatory publication register lists Transmission Development Plan 2024, the 2024 Ten-Year Transmission Forecast Statement and current adequacy publications. This is the discovery and version-control entry for the earlier published development plan while the 2026 to 2035 draft is under CRU consultation.
A listed project is not evidence that it supplies a particular site, has all consents, or guarantees a delivery date. No reinforcement dependency has been assigned to a pilot merely from geographic proximity. The statutory development-plan cycle is two years; PowerPlotr proposes monthly checks for a new approved version or delivery update.
EirGrid: Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationDraft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationCommission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid · Source checked
Consultation opened 7 October 2026 and is scheduled to close 20 November 2026. The linked draft is dated June 2026 and describes planned transmission works, contracted customer connections and indicative delivery timeframes. Development plans are published on a two-year cycle. Proposed PowerPlotr review is weekly during consultation and on publication of the final version.
This is a draft under consultation as at the access date. Do not label it final or treat its project dates as a site connection commitment. A named reinforcement must be matched to published site-specific connection scope before it becomes an energisation dependency.
Commission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid: Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationPublished 7 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationAll-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035EirGrid and SONI · Source checked
The current adequacy publication assesses demand and generation over 2026 to 2035. It provides the successor resource-adequacy context to older Generation Capacity Statements, together with its main report, workbook, methodology and country assumptions. The main report's data-centre forecast considers projects already connected or with signed connection agreements at its study freeze date.
System adequacy is distinct from local connection headroom. The forecast is not a live site-level connection register and cannot establish a particular site's contracted or energised capacity. Publication and data-freeze dates differ. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for the next assessment, corrections or updated inputs; no fixed publication day is assumed.
EirGrid and SONI: All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotationAn Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked
Official search for appeals, direct strategic infrastructure applications and related cases, including grid works. The current authority is An Coimisiún Pleanála, formerly An Bord Pleanála. Search by case reference, location, applicant and infrastructure to match a site with grid planning decisions and conditions. Proposed review is weekly and whenever a relevant case changes.
A grid planning application, pre-application consultation or permission does not establish an executed connection agreement, import capacity, route rights or energisation. Check the actual decision documents and exact development boundary. A target decision date is not the decision. The portal has no guaranteed fixed case-update interval.
An Coimisiún Pleanála: An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationLocal Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersLocal Government Management Agency and local planning authorities · Source checked
Official portal for local authority planning applications. Use the specific authority register and case documents to establish published substation, cable, generation, storage and site planning scope. Proposed review is weekly for active pilot cases and when new documents are lodged.
Portal coverage and historical files vary by authority, so the original authority record remains necessary. Applicant statements remain applicant evidence unless independently corroborated. Planning does not prove a connection offer or agreement, and an indicative equipment rating is not contracted import capacity. No common publisher refresh interval is stated.
Local Government Management Agency and local planning authorities: Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotationCountry coverage: Ireland pilot. View all country sources and refresh schedules.
Derived energisation window
The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.
Rule
Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.
- Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: earliest readiness
- Unknown
Input evidence
- ACP refusal order, printed pages 2 to 4An Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 15 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: latest readiness
- Unknown
Input evidence
- ACP refusal order, printed pages 2 to 4An Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 15 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Dependencies driving the range
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
- Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
- Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: ACP refused the proposal for failure to demonstrate a connection agreement, grid capacity and adequate renewable arrangements. This records the planning decision, not a new assessment of a replacement project.
What the earliest case requires
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
- Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal is ready by the earliest case, which has no published readiness date: ACP refused the proposal for failure to demonstrate a connection agreement, grid capacity and adequate renewable arrangements. This records the planning decision, not a new assessment of a replacement project.
Missing inputs leave the range open
- A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
- An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
- Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
- Grid-works planning status and programme
- Earliest readiness for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
- A published upper readiness year for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
- Resolution of Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal (not-met).
Indicative HV and connection capex
Unknown
Rule and scope
Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.
No observed inputs establish this result.
Scope questions
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
- Confirm whether connection requires loop-in, new station, bay works, customer transformation and network reinforcement.
- Publish route lengths, voltage and circuit count for the actual agreed design.
- Identify changes required by any replacement planning or connection application.
Alternatives and policy exposure
Behind-the-meter generation
- An Bord PleanalaPublished 22 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- An Coimisiun PleanalaPublished 14 August 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Battery storage
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Private wire
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Gas
- An Bord PleanalaPublished 22 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Planning / policy requirement
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?Connection claim against current policy
- Compliance unverified
The refused proposal did not demonstrate a fixed connection agreement, network capacity or adequate renewable arrangements to the planning authority. A replacement claim requires fresh evidence.
Rule: Report ACP findings as evidenced planning history; do not infer that a later or revised application is automatically non-compliant. - Compliance unverified
The applicant proposed dispatchable generation but the later inspector assessment found its operation insufficiently explained. Equivalent de-rated output, separate metering and delivery remain questions.
Rule: Proposed nameplate generation alone does not demonstrate satisfaction of dispatchable generation or storage requirements.
Rule and inputs
Read the refusal order alongside the August 2026 inspector assessment. Preserve the refusal and unverified replacement status.
- Decision
- Refused 15 September 2026
Input evidence
- ACP refusal order, printed pages 2 to 4An Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 15 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
- Dispatchability assessment
- Operating arrangements not demonstrated
Input evidence
- ACP additional inspector report, printed pages 13 to 15, policy and dispatchability evidenceAn Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 14 August 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Open questions for a Reality Check
Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.
54 questions to resolve
- What is the straight-line distance using evidenced site and connection-point coordinates?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What route length is published for the grid connection?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What applied import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated applied capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the applied capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?
Verification has not been established.
- What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated offered capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the offered capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?
Verification has not been established.
- What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated accepted capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the accepted capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?
Verification has not been established.
- What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What is the dated energised capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which buildings and phase does the energised capacity cover?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?
Verification has not been established.
- What connection agreement type has been executed or offered?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What capacity ramps or phased import limits are published?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What curtailment, flexible demand or dispatch obligations apply?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What generation or storage conditions are in the connection agreement?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What connection securities have been posted, and are they current?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What connection longstop dates and extension conditions apply?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What MVA import application or offer is evidenced by the operator?
Applicant states 58 MW maximum import capacity. No power factor is published and MW is not converted to MVA.
- Obtain the operator application and approved load schedule with import MVA, peak facility MW and design power factor.
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which approved generator schedule reconciles gross output, de-rated output and wholesale-market availability?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What published operator process timeline applies to this project and current capacity rung?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Which reinforcement projects does this connection depend on, with published completion dates?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Has a replacement scheme or the separate 110 kV connection and GIS works obtained consent?
The data centre permission was refused on 15 September 2026. Reserved substation land does not establish a grid-works permission or completion date.
- What published earliest completion year applies to energisationInputs.policyConditions.value?
No bounded completion year is published.
- What published latest completion year applies to energisationInputs.policyConditions.value?
No bounded completion year is published.
- What operator-approved connection scope, GIS configuration, circuit route and quantities apply to a permitted replacement scheme?
Only the applicant circuit concept and reserved future substation land were identified. No complete connection scope or comparable dated cost reference is established.
- Does the published scope include every necessary grid and customer connection work?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?
Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.
- Has any replacement application, revised operator assessment or new connection evidence superseded the refusal?
Research hand-off question.
- Which additional renewable projects, agreements and delivery dates support a replacement proposal?
Research hand-off question.
- What planning and operational licences permit dispatchable operation and for how many hours?
Research hand-off question.
- What de-rated capacity, wholesale-market participation and separately metered connection can be evidenced?
Research hand-off question.
- Confirm whether connection requires loop-in, new station, bay works, customer transformation and network reinforcement.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Publish route lengths, voltage and circuit count for the actual agreed design.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Identify changes required by any replacement planning or connection application.
Connection-cost scope question.
- Resolve the conflicting sources: Published proposed generator output is described as both 75 MW and 73 MW
Design descriptions differ. Neither establishes de-rated market-qualified dispatchable output or its delivery date.
- Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Earliest readiness for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: A published upper readiness year for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Resolve the energisation input: Resolution of Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal (not-met).
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
- Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
- Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.
Request a Reality CheckEarlier capacity notes and source context
Proposed IT load in submitted EIAR and ACP assessment; refused scheme, not delivered or contracted capacity.
Published claimProject source recordApproximate average electrical requirement in EIAR; not a maximum-import agreement or connection offer.
Published claimCapacity sourceACP found no demonstrated fixed grid agreement or sufficient capacity and inadequate evidence of renewable supply. 50 MW is average demand, not secured import. Nearby generation and 110 kV infrastructure do not confer a connection.
IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.
Planning & utilities
8 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.
Planning & decisions
Constraint foundRefused 15 September 2026 under PL16.322575 / 2460708. Earlier council approval is superseded.
Sources & next check
Land-use zoning
Partial evidenceACP identifies unzoned land outside Killala's settlement boundary. EDO40 explores possible SDZ designation; it does not establish an SDZ. Local policy support did not secure consent.
Sources & next check
Grid & import rights
Constraint foundACP found no demonstrated fixed grid agreement or sufficient capacity and inadequate evidence of renewable supply. 50 MW is average demand, not secured import. Nearby generation and 110 kV infrastructure do not confer a connection.
Sources & next check
Fibre & dark fibre
Partial evidenceEIAR identifies nearby Aurora and Eir cables. Aurora publicly offers dark fibre and maps existing backhaul to Killala/AEC-1. Project last-mile delivery, fibre pair availability and route diversity remain unverified.
Sources & next check
Ownership & development control
Partial evidenceApplication land-owner details identify Mayo County Council and recorded consent. Mayo Data Hub Limited is the applicant; neither field proves a completed sale or current freehold title.
Sources & next check
Land, footprint & access
DocumentedCouncil record identifies a 10.58 ha site and a proposed 29,076 m² two-level data-centre building. The building area includes support accommodation and is not IT white space.
Sources & next check
Water, cooling & heat
Partial evidenceSubmitted EIAR specifies closed-loop water cooling with roof chillers. It cites a September 2024 pre-connection enquiry and a confirmation-of-feasibility attachment; that is not an executed water connection or approved operating scheme.
Sources & next check
Demand & location fit
UnverifiedThe September 2026 refusal records no identified occupier able to engage in the proposed ETS arrangements. No contracted tenant or pre-let demand is established by the reviewed public record.
Sources & next check
Not assessed
Evidence still needed
- Flood, ground & environment
Flood risk, ground conditions, contamination, ecology, heritage, noise and air-quality constraints have not been fully assessed here.
- Programme & delivery
Permission expiry, commencement, energisation, enabling works, long-lead procurement and phase handovers need a reconciled programme.
Project team
Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.
Architect
Planning design and architectural drawings.
Appointment sourceEngineering consultant
Civil engineering planning drawings and traffic assessment.
Appointment sourceEnergy and sustainability statement; 2026 CRU policy response.
Appointment sourceEnvironmental impact assessment coordination and specialist assessments.
Appointment sourceSpecialists & vendors
Planning consultant and applicant's planning agent.
Appointment sourceLandscape plan.
Appointment sourceEIAR biodiversity assessment.
Appointment sourceEIAR landscape and visual impact assessment.
Appointment sourceEIAR archaeology, architecture and cultural heritage assessment.
Appointment sourceUnlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.
Sources
Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.
- An Coimisiún Pleanála: case PL16.322575 / local 2460708pleanala.ie · 15 Sept 2026
- ACP refusal order ABP-322575-25pleanala.ie · 15 Sept 2026
- Mayo County Council planning register 2460708eplanning.ie · Publication date unstated
- Mayo Data Hub EIAR Volume 2, received 21 November 2024pleanala.ie · 21 Nov 2024
- ACP additional inspector report ABP-322575A-25pleanala.ie · 14 Aug 2026
- AVAIO Digital identifies Orion campus as its Mayo Data Hub projectlinkedin.com · Publication date unstated
- RTÉ: Planning authority overturns approval for new Mayo data centrerte.ie · 17 Sept 2026
- ACP inspector report ABP-322575-25pleanala.ie · 22 Dec 2025
- Aurora Telecom: subsea cable connectivityauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
- Aurora Telecom dark fibre brochure and national network mapauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
- EXA Infrastructure: subsea systems / AEC-1exainfra.net · Publication date unstated
Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.
