Skip to content
Menu
Permission refused

AVAIO Orion / Mayo Data Hub — Killala

Killala, County Mayo, Ireland

Reviewed 26 Sept 202611 sources
Watch this site

Watch AVAIO Orion / Mayo Data Hub — Killala

Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.

Fields marked * are required.

Checking enquiry availability…

Request details

Register your interest in monitoring this record. Alerts are not active yet. Site Watch will cost €150 per site per month excluding VAT after any included trial.

Optional. Public information only. Do not include confidential or non-public information.

Project brief

Refused data centre proposal on 10.58 hectares south of the former Asahi complex. Distinct from the earlier MSN Partnership warehouse conversion. Grid capacity and renewable supply evidence did not satisfy ACP.

Read overview
Current evidencePermission refused

11 cited sources · 8 utility and planning categories reviewed.

Review evidence and gaps
Next check

Monitor ACP case and Mayo register for a revised application or judicial-review outcome; do not assume a challenge has been filed.

Open the full check

Overview

Refused data centre proposal on 10.58 hectares south of the former Asahi complex. Distinct from the earlier MSN Partnership warehouse conversion. Grid capacity and renewable supply evidence did not satisfy ACP.

Developer / applicant
Mayo Data Hub Limited / AVAIO Digital
Owner
Mayo County Council (landowner recorded in planning application; current title unverified)
Operator
Not verified

Planning and delivery status

ACP refused permission on 15 September 2026 (PL16.322575; council 2460708), superseding the council's 25 April 2025 decision to grant. Proposed scheme; no verified construction.

Stage source: 15 Sept 2026

Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.

POWER STUDY

Power

What the power evidence establishes

Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme

Power classDNo qualifying rung

No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.

The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.

Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. Evidence reviewed 19 October 2026.

Read the rules and verification levels
01

Capacity ladder and evidence

Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.

01

Applied

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What applied import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Event date
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What is the dated applied capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Which buildings and phase does the applied capacity cover?
Verification
Unknown
02

Offered

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Event date
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What is the dated offered capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Which buildings and phase does the offered capacity cover?
Verification
Unknown
03

Accepted / contracted

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Event date
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What is the dated accepted capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Which buildings and phase does the accepted capacity cover?
Verification
Unknown
04

Energised

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Event date
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What is the dated energised capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?
Capacity boundary
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Which buildings and phase does the energised capacity cover?
Verification
Unknown
Connection point and load boundaries
Network operator
Observed
EirGrid (TSO)
Connection point
Observed
Applicant proposes connection to the 110 kV Moy to Tawnaghmore Power Station circuit, with land reserved for a future GIS substation. The operator has not confirmed an accepted site connection.
Voltage
Observed
110 kV
Straight-line distance
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What is the straight-line distance using evidenced site and connection-point coordinates?
Published route length
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What route length is published for the grid connection?

Facility load

Observed
50 MW
Basis
Observed
Approximate average facility electrical power. Not peak import capacity or a metered average.
Site / phase boundary
Observed
Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme

Import capacity

Unknown

Applicant states 58 MW maximum import capacity. No power factor is published and MW is not converted to MVA.

What MVA import application or offer is evidenced by the operator?
Basis
Observed
Applicant appeal response states 58 MW maximum import capacity. The published unit is MW; it is not evidence of a MVA application, offer or contract.
Site / phase boundary
Observed
Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme

These are different electrical quantities. No power factor, PUE or available import is assumed from an IT-load statement.

Connection agreement and conditions
Agreement type
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What connection agreement type has been executed or offered?
Phased capacity
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What capacity ramps or phased import limits are published?
Flexibility obligations
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What curtailment, flexible demand or dispatch obligations apply?
On-site generation obligations
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What generation or storage conditions are in the connection agreement?
Securities posted
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What connection securities have been posted, and are they current?
Longstop dates
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What connection longstop dates and extension conditions apply?
Source quotations and access log (18)
  1. ACP refusal order, printed pages 2 to 4An Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 15 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    failed to demonstrate that they have a fixed connection agreement
  2. ACP inspector report, printed page 7, proposed circuit connectionAn Bord Pleanala · Published 22 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Moy110kV
    IT load of 40 MW
    c.50MW average electrical power
    58MW of maximum import capacity
    75 MW
    HVO
  3. ACP additional inspector report, printed page 13, generation output descriptionAn Coimisiun Pleanala · Published 14 August 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    73MW
    not how this would operate
  4. Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Meur/km
    Meur/asset
  5. Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Standard Charge
  6. CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Published 12 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Large Energy Users Connection Policy
  7. Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3EirGrid · Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    a data centre application cannot be progressed if it is in a constrained area
  8. Data Centre Technical AssessmentEirGrid · Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    will need to focus on connection voltages above 110 kV
  9. Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewEirGrid · Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    New capacity is not secured until a connection agreement contract is executed.
  10. CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Published 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    both currently connected and future connections
  11. MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective dateCommission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid · Published 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    The Grid Code will be deemed to be amended five weeks from the date of this decision letter.
  12. Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026ESB Networks · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    The map indicates transformer capacity only.
  13. Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025ESB Networks · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    the information provided is indicative
  14. Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerEirGrid · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Transmission Development Plan 2024
  15. Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationCommission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid · Published 7 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
    The CRU has published a consultation on the Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026-2035.
  16. All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035EirGrid and SONI · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    a comprehensive analysis of how demand and generation could evolve
  17. An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Case search
  18. Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersLocal Government Management Agency and local planning authorities · Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026
    Planning System
02

Conflicts and scope comparisons

Different bases; relationship unresolved

IT, average facility demand and maximum-import claim use different bases

The three figures describe different quantities. They are retained without assuming PUE, power factor or a contracted MVA entitlement.

Nominal IT capacity
Observed
40

MW IT design capacity.

Approximate average electrical demand
Observed
50

MW average facility demand.

Applicant maximum-import description
Observed
58

MW in the source, not MVA.

Resolution
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Obtain the operator application and approved load schedule with import MVA, peak facility MW and design power factor.
Unresolved

Published proposed generator output is described as both 75 MW and 73 MW

Design descriptions differ. Neither establishes de-rated market-qualified dispatchable output or its delivery date.

Original inspector report
Observed
75

MW output in proposed development description.

Additional inspector report
Observed
73

MW output in later assessment.

Resolution
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Which approved generator schedule reconciles gross output, de-rated output and wholesale-market availability?
03

Ireland grid context

Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.

CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked

Connection policy for new data centre applications, including matching dispatchable generation or storage, additional renewable electricity and network location assessment. At least 80% of annual demand must be met by additional renewable electricity generated in the Republic of Ireland, with a six-year glide path from energisation. Requirements and transitional scope must be checked against the actual application date and connection position.

A policy requirement is not evidence that a particular site has complied or has connection rights. Onsite or proximate generation is permitted; onsite-only generation is not a universal requirement. Do not retrospectively apply the new application rules to an earlier agreement without checking transitional scope. No fixed publisher update cadence is stated; PowerPlotr proposes a weekly policy check.

Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU/2025236: Large Energy Users Connection Policy decisionPublished 12 December 2025 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3EirGrid · Source checked

Implements CRU/2025236. For new transmission data centres at or above 10 MVA, nominated dispatchable generation or storage must match MIC after applicable de-rating and be delivered before energisation or demand ramp-up. Nominated generation is separately connected and metered and participates in the SEM. The stated offer-processing periods are approximately 7.5 calendar months where nominated generation and renewables already have offers, or up to 18 months where associated generation has newly applied through ECP-GSS.

These are conditional application-to-offer periods, not construction or energisation durations, and are excluded from energisation calculations. A complete application, linked generation status and fees matter. An offer is not an accepted agreement. Earlier applications can remain under CRU/21/124. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.

EirGrid: Data Centre Connection Offer Process and Policy, Version 3Published 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
Data Centre Technical AssessmentEirGrid · Source checked

Explains application-specific assessment of capacity, voltage, system stability, short-circuit effects and outages. Continuous demand above 50 MW is significant for the Irish 110 kV network and should focus on connection voltages above 110 kV. Dedicated loop-in connections are difficult to integrate and require wider system benefit.

General technical context cannot establish a connection point, headroom or capacity allocation for a particular site. Every proposal still requires operator assessment. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is monthly and after a related policy decision.

EirGrid: Data Centre Technical AssessmentPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewEirGrid · Source checked

Pages 11 to 12 identify high-level potential on the 220 kV network around Galway, Limerick and Cork, subject to individual assessment and policy compliance. The overview considers greater Dublin fully constrained for new data centre development. It advises a prudent mid-2030s assumption for new connections in the identified areas because of work and outage programmes.

Regional opportunity is not site-specific capacity or a contractual right. Mid-2030s is qualitative operator context, not a bounded energisation window or a promised 2035 date. Earlier applications and agreements require their own transitional-policy check. Detailed heat maps are planned through the 2027 Ten Year Transmission Forecast Statement. No recurring publisher cadence is specified; proposed review is monthly.

EirGrid: Data Centre Constrained Area OverviewPublished 20 May 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkCommission for Regulation of Utilities · Source checked

Approves fault ride-through, rate of change of frequency and active power recovery requirements for existing and future transmission-connected demand facilities. The technical requirements include remaining connected within the specified voltage profile, withstanding plus or minus 1 Hz/s and recovering 90% of pre-fault active power within 500 milliseconds after fault clearance and voltage recovery to 0.9 per unit. Compliance is assessed at the point of connection.

The associated Grid Code amendment takes effect on 27 October 2026. This is a separate technical requirement from the December 2025 connection policy. Site compliance, an approved derogation and any demand utilisation restriction need direct evidence. Missing public compliance evidence means unverified, not automatically non-compliant. Publisher updates are event-driven; proposed review is weekly.

Commission for Regulation of Utilities: CRU2026145: Grid Code Modification MPID 345 and Compliance and Derogation FrameworkPublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective dateCommission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid · Source checked

The CRU directs EirGrid to amend the Grid Code five weeks after the 22 September 2026 decision. EirGrid's Grid Code Modifications register labels this approval effective 27 October 2026. The letter applies the technical requirements to all transmission-connected demand facilities.

The effective date does not itself prove compliance or an energisation entitlement at any site. Review the decision, current Grid Code and any approved derogation together. Publisher cadence is event-driven; proposed review is weekly through implementation.

Commission for Regulation of Utilities, hosted by EirGrid: MPID 345 CRU approval letter and effective datePublished 22 September 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026ESB Networks · Source checked

Indicates available transformer capacity for demand and generation at distribution substations. The download is labelled July 2026, but station capacity and demand contracts and offers are dated to Q4 2025, with 2024/2025 load readings. The publisher's stated objective is quarterly map updates. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for a replacement file and records the underlying data date separately from its label.

Transformer headroom is not guaranteed upstream network capacity, a connection offer, or site rights. HV locations are indicative. ESB's 6 to 9 month minor-works and approximately 2 to 3 year significant-station-work examples concern MV connections up to 10 MVA under stated conditions; they are not valid timing inputs for large transmission-connected pilots.

ESB Networks: Availability Capacity Heatmap and customer download, July 2026Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025ESB Networks · Source checked

The DNDP identifies distribution investment and flexibility needs. Its Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025 provides indicative headroom at existing 110 kV and 38 kV substations under four growth scenarios, with annual forecasts to 2030 and five-year intervals to 2050. The publisher says capacity workbooks update annually and network development plans every two years. Proposed PowerPlotr review is monthly.

Workbook headroom does not establish upstream feeder or transmission capacity, final site connections or rights. Future headroom can depend on planned reinforcement; verify the specific project's delivery and consent status. The checked landing page identifies and explains the workbooks; workbook cells have not been imported into the pilot.

ESB Networks: Distribution Network Development Plan and Demand Capacity Headroom Report 2025Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerEirGrid · Source checked

The checked regulatory publication register lists Transmission Development Plan 2024, the 2024 Ten-Year Transmission Forecast Statement and current adequacy publications. This is the discovery and version-control entry for the earlier published development plan while the 2026 to 2035 draft is under CRU consultation.

A listed project is not evidence that it supplies a particular site, has all consents, or guarantees a delivery date. No reinforcement dependency has been assigned to a pilot merely from geographic proximity. The statutory development-plan cycle is two years; PowerPlotr proposes monthly checks for a new approved version or delivery update.

EirGrid: Transmission Development Plan 2024 and regulatory publications registerPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationCommission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid · Source checked

Consultation opened 7 October 2026 and is scheduled to close 20 November 2026. The linked draft is dated June 2026 and describes planned transmission works, contracted customer connections and indicative delivery timeframes. Development plans are published on a two-year cycle. Proposed PowerPlotr review is weekly during consultation and on publication of the final version.

This is a draft under consultation as at the access date. Do not label it final or treat its project dates as a site connection commitment. A named reinforcement must be matched to published site-specific connection scope before it becomes an energisation dependency.

Commission for Regulation of Utilities and EirGrid: Draft Transmission Development Plan 2026 to 2035, CRU consultationPublished 7 October 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035EirGrid and SONI · Source checked

The current adequacy publication assesses demand and generation over 2026 to 2035. It provides the successor resource-adequacy context to older Generation Capacity Statements, together with its main report, workbook, methodology and country assumptions. The main report's data-centre forecast considers projects already connected or with signed connection agreements at its study freeze date.

System adequacy is distinct from local connection headroom. The forecast is not a live site-level connection register and cannot establish a particular site's contracted or energised capacity. Publication and data-freeze dates differ. PowerPlotr proposes a monthly check for the next assessment, corrections or updated inputs; no fixed publication day is assumed.

EirGrid and SONI: All-Island Resource Adequacy Assessment 2026 to 2035Published Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 30 daysRead the source quotation
An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesAn Coimisiún Pleanála · Source checked

Official search for appeals, direct strategic infrastructure applications and related cases, including grid works. The current authority is An Coimisiún Pleanála, formerly An Bord Pleanála. Search by case reference, location, applicant and infrastructure to match a site with grid planning decisions and conditions. Proposed review is weekly and whenever a relevant case changes.

A grid planning application, pre-application consultation or permission does not establish an executed connection agreement, import capacity, route rights or energisation. Check the actual decision documents and exact development boundary. A target decision date is not the decision. The portal has no guaranteed fixed case-update interval.

An Coimisiún Pleanála: An Coimisiún Pleanála case search and strategic infrastructure casesPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation
Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersLocal Government Management Agency and local planning authorities · Source checked

Official portal for local authority planning applications. Use the specific authority register and case documents to establish published substation, cable, generation, storage and site planning scope. Proposed review is weekly for active pilot cases and when new documents are lodged.

Portal coverage and historical files vary by authority, so the original authority record remains necessary. Applicant statements remain applicant evidence unless independently corroborated. Planning does not prove a connection offer or agreement, and an indicative equipment rating is not contracted import capacity. No common publisher refresh interval is stated.

Local Government Management Agency and local planning authorities: Local Government Online Planning and local authority planning registersPublished Unknown · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Last checked 19 October 2026 · Review every 7 daysRead the source quotation

Country coverage: Ireland pilot. View all country sources and refresh schedules.

04

Derived energisation window

Earliest plausible yearUnknown
Latest plausible yearUnknown

The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.

Rule

Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.

Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: earliest readiness
Unknown
Input evidence
Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: latest readiness
Unknown
Input evidence

Dependencies driving the range

  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
  • Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
  • Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal: ACP refused the proposal for failure to demonstrate a connection agreement, grid capacity and adequate renewable arrangements. This records the planning decision, not a new assessment of a replacement project.

What the earliest case requires

  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
  • Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
  • Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal is ready by the earliest case, which has no published readiness date: ACP refused the proposal for failure to demonstrate a connection agreement, grid capacity and adequate renewable arrangements. This records the planning decision, not a new assessment of a replacement project.

Missing inputs leave the range open

  • A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
  • An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
  • Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
  • Grid-works planning status and programme
  • Earliest readiness for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
  • A published upper readiness year for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.
  • Resolution of Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal (not-met).
05

Indicative HV and connection capex

Unknown

Rule and scope

Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.

No observed inputs establish this result.

Published connection works scope
Unknown

Only the applicant circuit concept and reserved future substation land were identified. No complete connection scope or comparable dated cost reference is established.

What operator-approved connection scope, GIS configuration, circuit route and quantities apply to a permitted replacement scheme?
Scope completeness
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Does the published scope include every necessary grid and customer connection work?

Scope questions

  • Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
  • Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
  • Confirm whether connection requires loop-in, new station, bay works, customer transformation and network reinforcement.
  • Publish route lengths, voltage and circuit count for the actual agreed design.
  • Identify changes required by any replacement planning or connection application.
Country reference bands and sources
Ireland: published reference bands and missing configurations
ConfigurationVoltageType / unitLowHighCurrencyPrice baseUse and source
110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit110 / 132 / 150 kVoverhead
per km
570,000910,000EURUnknownContext only
110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits110 / 132 / 150 kVoverhead
per km
300,000390,000EURUnknownContext only
220 kV, 1 circuit220 kVoverhead
per km
320,000510,000EURUnknownContext only
220 kV, 2 circuits220 kVoverhead
per km
440,000740,000EURUnknownContext only
110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit110 / 132 / 150 kVunderground
per km
560,0001,590,000EURUnknownContext only
110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits110 / 132 / 150 kVunderground
per km
1,330,0003,580,000EURUnknownContext only
220 kV, 1 circuit220 kVunderground
per km
1,030,0002,400,000EURUnknownContext only
220 kV, 2 circuits220 kVunderground
per km
2,990,0004,690,000EURUnknownContext only
New GIS station, 0 to 5 bays, all reported voltage classes kVstation
per item
5,480,00015,110,000EURUnknownContext only
New GIS station, 6 to 9 bays, all reported voltage classes kVstation
per item
8,540,00012,600,000EURUnknownContext only
New AIS line bay in existing 110 kV single busbar outdoor station110 kVbay
per item
763,440763,440EUR2026Context only
630 square millimetre aluminium XLPE, single circuit, exactly one kilometre110 kVunderground
per km
398,640398,640EUR2026Context only
Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 31.5 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension110 kVstation
per item
1,504,2101,504,210EUR2026Context only
Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 63 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension110 kVstation
per item
1,826,8501,826,850EUR2026Context only
Complete shared substation bay connection in Ireland110 / 220 kVUnknown: A published AIS electrical bay component does not establish civils, shared allocation or a complete connection cost.
Scope questions
  • Which bay type, voltage, scope and cost-sharing arrangement apply?
  • What civils, protection, remote-end and reinforcement works are chargeable?
No eligible reference
Complete new 110 kV substation in Ireland110 kVUnknown: The ESB Networks 2026 whole-station types are discontinued; current transformer components exclude civil works.
Scope questions
  • What busbar arrangement, bay count, transformers, buildings and site works are published?
  • Is an Irish report or tender award available for the same scope and price base?
No eligible reference
New 132 kV substation132 kVUnknown: No Irish same-scope published cost band established; the voltage is a UK comparison requirement.
Scope questions
  • Which jurisdiction and operator standard apply?
  • What published construction reference matches the configuration?
No eligible reference
Complete new 220 kV or 275 kV GIS substation220 / 275 kVUnknown: The EU GIS comparison is grouped by bays, without a voltage-specific matched Irish band.
Scope questions
  • What GIS busbar design, bays, transformer scope and import arrangement are required?
  • Which published cost source matches voltage, geography, scope and price base?
No eligible reference
Complete switching station110 / 220 kVUnknown: No matched complete Irish public construction band verified.
Scope questions
  • What voltage, circuit topology, bay count, civils and protection scope apply?
  • Are published total costs separated from unrelated reinforcement?
No eligible reference
Reference scope, exclusions and price basis
EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

570,000 to 910,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 6 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

300,000 to 390,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 8 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 220 kV, 1 circuit overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

320,000 to 510,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 1 circuit · 220 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 15 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 220 kV, 2 circuits overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

440,000 to 740,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 2 circuits · 220 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 25 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

560,000 to 1,590,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 20 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

1,330,000 to 3,580,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 7 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 220 kV, 1 circuit underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

1,030,000 to 2,400,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 1 circuit · 220 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 20 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: 220 kV, 2 circuits underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

2,990,000 to 4,690,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 2 circuits · 220 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 9 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
  • Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: new GIS station with 0 to 5 bays, voltage unspecifiedContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

5,480,000 to 15,110,000 EUR per item · New GIS station, 0 to 5 bays, all reported voltage classes · kV · station

ACER Table I.2, page 44. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 13 assets.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Voltage-specific and Irish applicability unverified. This is not a 220 kV or 275 kV station band.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established.
  • Transformer scope and fees unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
EU comparator: new GIS station with 6 to 9 bays, voltage unspecifiedContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

8,540,000 to 12,600,000 EUR per item · New GIS station, 6 to 9 bays, all reported voltage classes · kV · station

ACER Table I.2, page 44. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 24 assets.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions
  • Voltage-specific and Irish applicability unverified. This is not a 220 kV or 275 kV station band.
  • Single monetary base year not explicitly established.
  • Transformer scope and fees unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.
110 kV AIS line bay electrical componentContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

763,440 to 763,440 EUR per item · New AIS line bay in existing 110 kV single busbar outdoor station · 110 kV · bay

Item 35, pages 30 to 31. Electrical component including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions
  • Generator standard charge, not a complete demand connection construction price.
  • Civils and remote-end works excluded; existing space, services and protection assumed adequate.
  • Shared customer contribution, land, access and site-specific reinforcement unknown.
110 kV underground cable electrical component for one kilometreContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

398,640 to 398,640 EUR per km · 630 square millimetre aluminium XLPE, single circuit, exactly one kilometre · 110 kV · underground

Item 8, pages 12 to 13. Generator cable charge for one kilometre only. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions
  • For more than one kilometre, ESB Networks states specific tender and pass-through charging apply.
  • Excavation, ducting, reinstatement and other civil works excluded.
  • Not an all-in construction cost or a scalable multi-kilometre rate.
110/38 kV, 31.5 MVA transformer electrical packageContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

1,504,210 to 1,504,210 EUR per item · Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 31.5 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension · 110 kV · station

Item 19, page 16. Electrical transformer package including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions
  • Generator standard charge; not a complete new 110 kV substation cost.
  • Civil works excluded. Incoming connection, land, remote works and project allocation remain unknown.
110/38 kV, 63 MVA transformer electrical packageContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

1,826,850 to 1,826,850 EUR per item · Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 63 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension · 110 kV · station

Item 18, page 15. Electrical transformer package including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions
  • Generator standard charge; not a complete new 110 kV substation cost.
  • Civil works excluded. Incoming connection, land, remote works and project allocation remain unknown.
06

Alternatives and policy exposure

Behind-the-meter generation

Observed
Applicant proposes dual-fuel backup and potentially dispatchable generation. Approved de-rating, metering, market participation and operating permissions were not demonstrated to ACP.
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?

Battery storage

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?

Private wire

Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?

Gas

Observed
HVO and gas are proposed fuels, with provision for future gas connection when available. A gas agreement, supply date and permitted continuous gas operation were not established.
Planning / policy requirement
Unknown

Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?

Connection claim against current policy

Derived
  • Compliance unverified

    The refused proposal did not demonstrate a fixed connection agreement, network capacity or adequate renewable arrangements to the planning authority. A replacement claim requires fresh evidence.

    Rule: Report ACP findings as evidenced planning history; do not infer that a later or revised application is automatically non-compliant.
  • Compliance unverified

    The applicant proposed dispatchable generation but the later inspector assessment found its operation insufficiently explained. Equivalent de-rated output, separate metering and delivery remain questions.

    Rule: Proposed nameplate generation alone does not demonstrate satisfaction of dispatchable generation or storage requirements.
Rule and inputs

Read the refusal order alongside the August 2026 inspector assessment. Preserve the refusal and unverified replacement status.

Decision
Refused 15 September 2026
Input evidence
Dispatchability assessment
Operating arrangements not demonstrated
Input evidence
07

Open questions for a Reality Check

Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.

54 questions to resolve
  1. What is the straight-line distance using evidenced site and connection-point coordinates?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  2. What route length is published for the grid connection?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  3. What applied import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  4. What is the dated applied capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  5. Which buildings and phase does the applied capacity cover?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  6. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?

    Verification has not been established.

  7. What offered import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  8. What is the dated offered capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  9. Which buildings and phase does the offered capacity cover?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  10. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?

    Verification has not been established.

  11. What accepted import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  12. What is the dated accepted capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  13. Which buildings and phase does the accepted capacity cover?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  14. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?

    Verification has not been established.

  15. What energised import capacity in MVA is evidenced for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  16. What is the dated energised capacity milestone for Mayo Data Hub proposed single-building Killala scheme?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  17. Which buildings and phase does the energised capacity cover?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  18. What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?

    Verification has not been established.

  19. What connection agreement type has been executed or offered?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  20. What capacity ramps or phased import limits are published?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  21. What curtailment, flexible demand or dispatch obligations apply?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  22. What generation or storage conditions are in the connection agreement?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  23. What connection securities have been posted, and are they current?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  24. What connection longstop dates and extension conditions apply?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  25. What MVA import application or offer is evidenced by the operator?

    Applicant states 58 MW maximum import capacity. No power factor is published and MW is not converted to MVA.

  26. Obtain the operator application and approved load schedule with import MVA, peak facility MW and design power factor.

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  27. Which approved generator schedule reconciles gross output, de-rated output and wholesale-market availability?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  28. What published operator process timeline applies to this project and current capacity rung?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  29. Which reinforcement projects does this connection depend on, with published completion dates?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  30. Has a replacement scheme or the separate 110 kV connection and GIS works obtained consent?

    The data centre permission was refused on 15 September 2026. Reserved substation land does not establish a grid-works permission or completion date.

  31. What published earliest completion year applies to energisationInputs.policyConditions.value?

    No bounded completion year is published.

  32. What published latest completion year applies to energisationInputs.policyConditions.value?

    No bounded completion year is published.

  33. What operator-approved connection scope, GIS configuration, circuit route and quantities apply to a permitted replacement scheme?

    Only the applicant circuit concept and reserved future substation land were identified. No complete connection scope or comparable dated cost reference is established.

  34. Does the published scope include every necessary grid and customer connection work?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  35. Does planning permission or applicable connection policy require this alternative?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  36. What battery storage is proposed, consented or operating?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  37. What private-wire route, counterparty and consent are evidenced?

    Not established in the public sources reviewed on 19 October 2026.

  38. Has any replacement application, revised operator assessment or new connection evidence superseded the refusal?

    Research hand-off question.

  39. Which additional renewable projects, agreements and delivery dates support a replacement proposal?

    Research hand-off question.

  40. What planning and operational licences permit dispatchable operation and for how many hours?

    Research hand-off question.

  41. What de-rated capacity, wholesale-market participation and separately metered connection can be evidenced?

    Research hand-off question.

  42. Confirm whether connection requires loop-in, new station, bay works, customer transformation and network reinforcement.

    Connection-cost scope question.

  43. Publish route lengths, voltage and circuit count for the actual agreed design.

    Connection-cost scope question.

  44. Identify changes required by any replacement planning or connection application.

    Connection-cost scope question.

  45. Resolve the conflicting sources: Published proposed generator output is described as both 75 MW and 73 MW

    Design descriptions differ. Neither establishes de-rated market-qualified dispatchable output or its delivery date.

  46. Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  47. Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  48. Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  49. Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  50. Resolve the energisation input: Earliest readiness for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  51. Resolve the energisation input: A published upper readiness year for Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal.

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  52. Resolve the energisation input: Resolution of Connection, dispatchability and renewable evidence following PL16.322575 refusal (not-met).

    This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.

  53. Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.

    This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.

  54. Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.

    This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.

Use these questions to scope a Power Reality Check.

Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.

Request a Reality Check
Earlier capacity notes and source context
40 MW ITProject capacity

Proposed IT load in submitted EIAR and ACP assessment; refused scheme, not delivered or contracted capacity.

Published claimProject source record
50 MW facilityAverage facility electricity demand

Approximate average electrical requirement in EIAR; not a maximum-import agreement or connection offer.

Published claimCapacity source
Import rights and connection evidence

ACP found no demonstrated fixed grid agreement or sufficient capacity and inadequate evidence of renewable supply. 50 MW is average demand, not secured import. Nearby generation and 110 kV infrastructure do not confer a connection.

IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.

Planning & utilities

8 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.

Planning & decisions

Constraint found

Refused 15 September 2026 under PL16.322575 / 2460708. Earlier council approval is superseded.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Monitor ACP case and Mayo register for a revised application or judicial-review outcome; do not assume a challenge has been filed.

Land-use zoning

Partial evidence

ACP identifies unzoned land outside Killala's settlement boundary. EDO40 explores possible SDZ designation; it does not establish an SDZ. Local policy support did not secure consent.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Check adopted CDP/settlement mapping and any formal SDZ designation or variation before labelling the parcel zoned.

Grid & import rights

Constraint found

ACP found no demonstrated fixed grid agreement or sufficient capacity and inadequate evidence of renewable supply. 50 MW is average demand, not secured import. Nearby generation and 110 kV infrastructure do not confer a connection.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Require published EirGrid/ESBN connection evidence, MIC in MVA, energisation date, defined additional renewable supply and permissions for associated infrastructure.

Fibre & dark fibre

Partial evidence

EIAR identifies nearby Aurora and Eir cables. Aurora publicly offers dark fibre and maps existing backhaul to Killala/AEC-1. Project last-mile delivery, fibre pair availability and route diversity remain unverified.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Check public planning further-information response, provider-confirmed point of interconnect, access rights and two physically diverse last-mile routes.

Ownership & development control

Partial evidence

Application land-owner details identify Mayo County Council and recorded consent. Mayo Data Hub Limited is the applicant; neither field proves a completed sale or current freehold title.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Verify current folio, transfer completion and applicant development rights.

Land, footprint & access

Documented

Council record identifies a 10.58 ha site and a proposed 29,076 m² two-level data-centre building. The building area includes support accommodation and is not IT white space.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Reconcile the refused red-line site with any revised application; verify usable land after constraints.

Water, cooling & heat

Partial evidence

Submitted EIAR specifies closed-loop water cooling with roof chillers. It cites a September 2024 pre-connection enquiry and a confirmation-of-feasibility attachment; that is not an executed water connection or approved operating scheme.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Check revised cooling design and actual water/foul connection agreements if a replacement proposal advances.

Demand & location fit

Unverified

The September 2026 refusal records no identified occupier able to engage in the proposed ETS arrangements. No contracted tenant or pre-let demand is established by the reviewed public record.

Sources & next check
Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Require a dated primary occupier or binding pre-let disclosure; do not infer demand from sponsor forecasts.

Not assessed

Flood, ground & environmentProgramme & delivery
Evidence still needed
  • Flood, ground & environment

    Flood risk, ground conditions, contamination, ecology, heritage, noise and air-quality constraints have not been fully assessed here.

  • Programme & delivery

    Permission expiry, commencement, energisation, enabling works, long-lead procurement and phase handovers need a reconciled programme.

Project team

Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.

Architect

Engineering consultant

Specialists & vendors

Unlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.

Sources

Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.

  1. An Coimisiún Pleanála: case PL16.322575 / local 2460708pleanala.ie · 15 Sept 2026
  2. ACP refusal order ABP-322575-25pleanala.ie · 15 Sept 2026
  3. Mayo County Council planning register 2460708eplanning.ie · Publication date unstated
  4. Mayo Data Hub EIAR Volume 2, received 21 November 2024pleanala.ie · 21 Nov 2024
  5. ACP additional inspector report ABP-322575A-25pleanala.ie · 14 Aug 2026
  6. AVAIO Digital identifies Orion campus as its Mayo Data Hub projectlinkedin.com · Publication date unstated
  7. RTÉ: Planning authority overturns approval for new Mayo data centrerte.ie · 17 Sept 2026
  8. ACP inspector report ABP-322575-25pleanala.ie · 22 Dec 2025
  9. Aurora Telecom: subsea cable connectivityauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
  10. Aurora Telecom dark fibre brochure and national network mapauroratelecom.ie · Publication date unstated
  11. EXA Infrastructure: subsea systems / AEC-1exainfra.net · Publication date unstated

Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.