Permitted

Killala Business Park — MSN Partnership data centre site

Killala, County Mayo, Ireland

Reviewed 26 Sept 20267 sources

Watch this site

Watch Killala Business Park — MSN Partnership data centre site

Register interest in updates to planning status, grid position, capacity claims, delivery teams and policy exposure. Every Power Reality Check client receives 60 days of Site Watch on their assessed site when monitoring is available.

Project brief

Separate brownfield data centre consent within the former Asahi complex: conversion of a 12,000 m² warehouse, new 13,200 m² data centre and 725 m² networking building. DNG markets 6.3 hectares at price on…

Read overview

Current evidencePermitted

7 cited sources · 6 utility and planning categories reviewed.

Review evidence and gaps

Next check

Locate an actual connection offer/agreement and MIC, plus any substation and generation obligations; do not count neighbouring plant ratings as project capacity.

Open the full check

Overview

Developer / applicant: MSN Partnership (planning applicant)
Owner: Not verified
Operator: Not verified

Planning and delivery status

Permission 16/694 granted 16 June 2017; extension 16/6940 decided 16 November 2021 expires 15 June 2027. Register checked 26 September 2026 shows no commencements received. Separately marketed site; construction and current ownership unverified.

Stage source: 16 Nov 2021

Project intelligence. This record does not establish that the land or facility is available to acquire.

POWER STUDY

Power

What the power evidence establishes

The site-specific connection scope has not been established for this record.

Power classDNo qualifying rung

No same-scope, dated import-MVA rung has document-seen or better verification. Nearby infrastructure, IT MW and marketing claims cannot upgrade the class.

The class describes published documentary evidence at its stated date. It does not prove current contractual rights, transferability or an energisation date.

Class describes evidence maturity. Public records do not prove current contractual rights, transferable capacity or an energisation date. This record has not received a complete power study review.

Read the rules and verification levels

Capacity ladder and evidence

Each rung is a separate MVA claim for its stated site or phase. A missing rung is unknown.

Applied

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

Event date

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?

Capacity boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?

Verification

Unknown

Offered

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

Event date

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?

Capacity boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?

Verification

Unknown

Accepted / contracted

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

Event date

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?

Capacity boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?

Verification

Unknown

Energised

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?

Event date

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?

Capacity boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?

Verification

Unknown

Connection point and load boundaries

Network operator: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?
Connection point: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?
Voltage: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?
Straight-line distance: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?
Published route length: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?

IT load

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published IT load in MW?

Basis

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?

Site / phase boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?

Facility load

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published facility load in MW?

Basis

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?

Site / phase boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?

Import capacity

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What is the published import capacity in MVA?

Basis

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?

Site / phase boundary

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?

These are different electrical quantities. No power factor, PUE or available import is assumed from an IT-load statement.

Connection agreement and conditions

Agreement type: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What connection agreement type and current status are documented?
Phased capacity: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?
Flexibility obligations: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?
On-site generation obligations: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What on-site generation obligations apply?
Securities posted: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What securities are required, posted and still valid?
Longstop dates: Unknown
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?

Source quotations and access log (2)

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
Meur/km
Meur/asset
Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026
Standard Charge

Conflicts and scope comparisons

No conflicting pair is recorded. This does not establish that all public statements have been reconciled.

Ireland grid context

Network publications frame the claim. They do not allocate capacity to this site.

No country context entries have been linked to this site. Applicable policy, capacity information and reinforcement dependencies need review.

Country coverage: Ireland pilot. View all country sources and refresh schedules.

Derived energisation window

Earliest plausible yearUnknown

Latest plausible yearUnknown

The observed inputs do not establish a bounded delivery range. Open bounds stay unknown.

Rule

Use only a same-scope, dated, document-verified capacity rung and an applicable duration to energisation published by the observed site operator. The named process operator and a named source publisher must match that operator. Earliest year is the maximum of stage date plus minimum duration and each evidenced readiness constraint. Latest year is the maximum of stage date plus maximum duration and each published upper constraint only when every required input is bounded. An offer-processing duration is excluded. A missing required input leaves the affected bound unknown; no padding or contractual delivery promise is inferred.

No observed inputs establish this result.

Dependencies driving the range

Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates: unknown.
Grid-works planning status and programme: unknown.
Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme: unknown.

What the earliest case requires

Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
Grid-works planning status and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.
Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme introduces no later constraint than the earliest case; this remains unverified.

Missing inputs leave the range open

A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
Grid-works planning status and programme
Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme

Indicative HV and connection capex

Unknown

Rule and scope

Sum each published complete scope quantity multiplied by the matching published benchmark minimum and maximum. Configuration, voltage, route type, unit, country applicability, currency and explicit price base year must match. No assumed route length, transformer count, exchange rate, inflation, fee uplift or partial index is inserted. The result is an indicative benchmark band, not an operator quotation or contractual connection charge.

No observed inputs establish this result.

Published connection works scope

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?

Scope completeness

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?

Scope questions

Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.

Country reference bands and sources

Ireland: published reference bands and missing configurations
Configuration	Voltage	Type / unit	Low	High	Currency	Price base	Use and source
110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit	110 / 132 / 150 kV	overhead per km	570,000	910,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits	110 / 132 / 150 kV	overhead per km	300,000	390,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
220 kV, 1 circuit	220 kV	overhead per km	320,000	510,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
220 kV, 2 circuits	220 kV	overhead per km	440,000	740,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit	110 / 132 / 150 kV	underground per km	560,000	1,590,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits	110 / 132 / 150 kV	underground per km	1,330,000	3,580,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
220 kV, 1 circuit	220 kV	underground per km	1,030,000	2,400,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
220 kV, 2 circuits	220 kV	underground per km	2,990,000	4,690,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
New GIS station, 0 to 5 bays, all reported voltage classes	kV	station per item	5,480,000	15,110,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
New GIS station, 6 to 9 bays, all reported voltage classes	kV	station per item	8,540,000	12,600,000	EUR	Unknown	Context only Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
New AIS line bay in existing 110 kV single busbar outdoor station	110 kV	bay per item	763,440	763,440	EUR	2026	Context only ESB Networks DACPublished 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
630 square millimetre aluminium XLPE, single circuit, exactly one kilometre	110 kV	underground per km	398,640	398,640	EUR	2026	Context only ESB Networks DACPublished 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 31.5 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension	110 kV	station per item	1,504,210	1,504,210	EUR	2026	Context only ESB Networks DACPublished 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 63 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension	110 kV	station per item	1,826,850	1,826,850	EUR	2026	Context only ESB Networks DACPublished 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation
Complete shared substation bay connection in Ireland	110 / 220 kV	Unknown: A published AIS electrical bay component does not establish civils, shared allocation or a complete connection cost. Scope questions Which bay type, voltage, scope and cost-sharing arrangement apply? What civils, protection, remote-end and reinforcement works are chargeable?					No eligible reference
Complete new 110 kV substation in Ireland	110 kV	Unknown: The ESB Networks 2026 whole-station types are discontinued; current transformer components exclude civil works. Scope questions What busbar arrangement, bay count, transformers, buildings and site works are published? Is an Irish report or tender award available for the same scope and price base?					No eligible reference
New 132 kV substation	132 kV	Unknown: No Irish same-scope published cost band established; the voltage is a UK comparison requirement. Scope questions Which jurisdiction and operator standard apply? What published construction reference matches the configuration?					No eligible reference
Complete new 220 kV or 275 kV GIS substation	220 / 275 kV	Unknown: The EU GIS comparison is grouped by bays, without a voltage-specific matched Irish band. Scope questions What GIS busbar design, bays, transformer scope and import arrangement are required? Which published cost source matches voltage, geography, scope and price base?					No eligible reference
Complete switching station	110 / 220 kV	Unknown: No matched complete Irish public construction band verified. Scope questions What voltage, circuit topology, bay count, civils and protection scope apply? Are published total costs separated from unrelated reinforcement?					No eligible reference

Reference scope, exclusions and price basis

EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

570,000 to 910,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 6 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

300,000 to 390,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 8 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 220 kV, 1 circuit overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

320,000 to 510,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 1 circuit · 220 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 15 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 220 kV, 2 circuits overhead routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

440,000 to 740,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 2 circuits · 220 kV · overhead

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 25 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

560,000 to 1,590,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 1 circuit · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 20 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

1,330,000 to 3,580,000 EUR per km · 110 to 150 kV, 2 circuits · 110 / 132 / 150 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 7 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 220 kV, 1 circuit underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

1,030,000 to 2,400,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 1 circuit · 220 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 20 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: 220 kV, 2 circuits underground routeContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

2,990,000 to 4,690,000 EUR per km · 220 kV, 2 circuits · 220 kV · underground

ACER Table I.1, page 43. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 9 assets; EU sample, not an Irish construction index.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Historical commissioned routes exceeding 5 kilometres; application to shorter connections is unverified.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established. No escalation, currency conversion or country adjustment applied.
Fees, customer allocation and project-specific scope are unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: new GIS station with 0 to 5 bays, voltage unspecifiedContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

5,480,000 to 15,110,000 EUR per item · New GIS station, 0 to 5 bays, all reported voltage classes · kV · station

ACER Table I.2, page 44. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 13 assets.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Voltage-specific and Irish applicability unverified. This is not a 220 kV or 275 kV station band.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established.
Transformer scope and fees unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

EU comparator: new GIS station with 6 to 9 bays, voltage unspecifiedContext only · EUR · Price base unknown

8,540,000 to 12,600,000 EUR per item · New GIS station, 6 to 9 bays, all reported voltage classes · kV · station

ACER Table I.2, page 44. Published 25th to 75th percentiles, 24 assets.

Fees: inclusion unknown.

Exclusions

Voltage-specific and Irish applicability unverified. This is not a 220 kV or 275 kV station band.
Single monetary base year not explicitly established.
Transformer scope and fees unverified. No complete site estimate may use this reference.

Energy infrastructure unit investment cost (UIC) indicators, 2026Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) · Published 24 April 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

110 kV AIS line bay electrical componentContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

763,440 to 763,440 EUR per item · New AIS line bay in existing 110 kV single busbar outdoor station · 110 kV · bay

Item 35, pages 30 to 31. Electrical component including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions

Generator standard charge, not a complete demand connection construction price.
Civils and remote-end works excluded; existing space, services and protection assumed adequate.
Shared customer contribution, land, access and site-specific reinforcement unknown.

Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

110 kV underground cable electrical component for one kilometreContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

398,640 to 398,640 EUR per km · 630 square millimetre aluminium XLPE, single circuit, exactly one kilometre · 110 kV · underground

Item 8, pages 12 to 13. Generator cable charge for one kilometre only. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions

For more than one kilometre, ESB Networks states specific tender and pass-through charging apply.
Excavation, ducting, reinstatement and other civil works excluded.
Not an all-in construction cost or a scalable multi-kilometre rate.

Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

110/38 kV, 31.5 MVA transformer electrical packageContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

1,504,210 to 1,504,210 EUR per item · Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 31.5 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension · 110 kV · station

Item 19, page 16. Electrical transformer package including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions

Generator standard charge; not a complete new 110 kV substation cost.
Civil works excluded. Incoming connection, land, remote works and project allocation remain unknown.

Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

110/38 kV, 63 MVA transformer electrical packageContext only · EUR · 2026 price base

1,826,850 to 1,826,850 EUR per item · Outdoor 110/38 kV, one 63 MVA transformer and 38 kV bay and two-bay busbar extension · 110 kV · station

Item 18, page 15. Electrical transformer package including design and commissioning. Excluding VAT.

Fees: not included.

Exclusions

Generator standard charge; not a complete new 110 kV substation cost.
Civil works excluded. Incoming connection, land, remote works and project allocation remain unknown.

Standard Prices for Generator Connections 2026, revision 16, effective 1 January 2026ESB Networks DAC · Published 2026 · Accessed 19 October 2026 · Source quotation

Alternatives and policy exposure

Behind-the-meter generation

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?

Planning / policy requirement

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?

Battery storage

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?

Planning / policy requirement

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?

Private wire

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?

Planning / policy requirement

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?

Gas

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?

Planning / policy requirement

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?

Connection claim against current policy

Unknown

Not established from the public records reviewed.

Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?

Open questions for a Reality Check

Generated from unknown fields, missing derivation inputs and unresolved evidence. The questions identify the documents or specialist checks needed next.

60 questions to resolve

Which TSO or DSO is responsible for this demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the operator-confirmed connection substation or circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What voltage level is specified for the demand connection?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What are the evidenced site and connection-point coordinates, and their calculated straight-line distance?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What grid route length is published, and for which circuit?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What applied mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the effective date of the applied connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which buildings or phases does the applied connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.applied?
Verification has not been established.
What offered mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the effective date of the offered connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which buildings or phases does the offered connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.offered?
Verification has not been established.
What accepted or contracted mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the effective date of the accepted connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which buildings or phases does the accepted connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.accepted?
Verification has not been established.
What energised mva is evidenced for the assessed site scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the effective date of the energised connection evidence?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which buildings or phases does the energised connection evidence cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What evidence level can be supported for capacityLadder.energised?
Verification has not been established.
What connection agreement type and current status are documented?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the agreement impose phased import-capacity limits?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What flexibility or curtailment obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What on-site generation obligations apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What securities are required, posted and still valid?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What connection longstop or milestone dates apply?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the published IT load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
On what electrical basis is the IT load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which phase or campus does the IT load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the published facility load in MW?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
On what electrical basis is the facility load in MW stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which phase or campus does the facility load in MW cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What is the published import capacity in MVA?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
On what electrical basis is the import capacity in MVA stated?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which phase or campus does the import capacity in MVA cover?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What operator-published connection-to-energisation duration applies to this site and connection stage?
An application-to-offer processing target is not an energisation duration.
Which reinforcements does the connection depend on, and what dates are published?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which grid works require planning, and what is their current consent status and dated programme?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which connection-policy conditions apply, and when could they be satisfied?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What complete connection scope is published: bays, stations, voltage, circuits, route lengths and underground or overhead configuration?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Is the published connection scope complete enough to match every component to a sourced benchmark?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What behind-the-meter generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require behind-the-meter generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What battery storage is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require battery storage?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What a private wire is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require a private wire?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
What gas supply or generation is evidenced, and at what scope?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the applicable planning or connection policy require gas supply or generation?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Does the published connection claim meet the policy applicable to its application date, location and agreement status?
Not established from the public records reviewed.
Which checked country-grid sources and location-specific constraints apply to this connection?
No country-context relationship has been established for this record.
Identify network and customer works, upstream reinforcement, land and wayleaves, taxes, fees, securities, contingency and the price base.
Connection-cost scope question.
Resolve the energisation input: A dated, document-verified import-MVA rung for the assessed scope.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
Resolve the energisation input: An applicable duration from the evidenced stage to energisation, published by and matched to the observed site operator, rather than an offer-processing target.
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
Resolve the energisation input: Connection-dependent reinforcement scope and completion dates
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
Resolve the energisation input: Grid-works planning status and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
Resolve the energisation input: Applicable connection-policy conditions and programme
This missing input leaves an energisation bound unknown.
Obtain a published complete connection scope with voltage, configuration and measured quantities.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.
Establish that every necessary connection-work component is included in the published scope.
This scope or reference gap prevents a complete indicative connection capex band.

Use these questions to scope a Power Reality Check.

Request an assessment of this record and the evidence needed next. Share only public information or documents you are authorised to provide.

Request a Reality Check

Earlier capacity notes and source context

No project-specific capacity figure is published in this record.

Import rights and connection evidence

No secured import MW/MVA or project IT load was located. Broker references to nearby power assets describe infrastructure, not an allocated supply.

IT load, facility demand, import capacity and equipment ratings retain their stated scope. A published figure does not establish spare or transferable supply.

Planning & utilities

6 of 10 categories contain evidence. Each status applies to its specific claim.

Planning & decisions

Documented

Original permission and extension are documented through 15 June 2027. Council register shows no commencements received; current implementation/compliance has not been established.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Monitor expiry, commencement notices and any replacement application. Check full conditions and interaction with adjoining 2360266 energy-hub consent.

Mayo County Council planning register 16694Source: 16 Jun 2017
Mayo County Council duration extension 166940Source: 16 Nov 2021

Land-use zoning

Partial evidence

ACP identifies Killala Business Park as unzoned, with policy support for data-centre/energy uses. The historic project has a separate consent, not a demonstrated SDZ designation.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Overlay the consent boundary on current adopted planning maps and adjacent energy-project boundaries.

ACP inspector report ABP-322575-25Source: 22 Dec 2025
Mayo County Council planning register 16694Source: 16 Jun 2017

Grid & import rights

Unverified

No secured import MW/MVA or project IT load was located. Broker references to nearby power assets describe infrastructure, not an allocated supply.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Locate an actual connection offer/agreement and MIC, plus any substation and generation obligations; do not count neighbouring plant ratings as project capacity.

DNG Michael Boland: Data Centre Site, Killala Business ParkSource: Publication date unstated
Mayo County Council planning register 16694Source: 16 Jun 2017

Fibre & dark fibre

Partial evidence

Broker places site adjacent to AEC-1 landing station. Aurora's public map and products support local backhaul availability, but do not prove a contracted site connection.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Verify exact parcel/CLS demarcation, project-specific access rights, spare pairs, delivery lead time and physically diverse paths.

DNG Michael Boland: Data Centre Site, Killala Business ParkSource: Publication date unstated
Aurora Telecom: subsea cable connectivitySource: Publication date unstated
Aurora Telecom dark fibre brochure and national network mapSource: Publication date unstated

Land, footprint & access

Documented

Permission describes conversion of a 12,000 m² warehouse, a new 13,200 m² data-centre building and a 725 m² networking building: 25,925 m² combined described building area. This is not usable IT space or verified vacant land.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Confirm the current approved drawings, building condition and net deployable area.

Mayo planning register — original application 16/694Source: 16 Jun 2017

Programme & delivery

Partial evidence

The duration-extension record gives an expiry of 15 June 2027. Implementation, remaining works and any subsequent extension are unverified; this consent is separate from refused Orion.

Sources & next check

Evidence reviewed 26 Sept 2026

Next check

Check commencement/compliance records and any extension or replacement permission before relying on expiry.

Mayo planning register — duration extension 16/6940Source: 16 Nov 2021

Not assessed

Ownership & development controlFlood, ground & environmentWater, cooling & heatDemand & location fit

Evidence still needed

Ownership & development control
Legal title, land-owning entity, development-control route and restrictions need verification. A named developer does not establish availability.
Flood, ground & environment
Flood risk, ground conditions, contamination, ecology, heritage, noise and air-quality constraints have not been fully assessed here.
Water, cooling & heat
Water availability and discharge, cooling technology, peak demand, heat reuse and utility agreements remain to be verified.
Demand & location fit
Customer geography, latency, cloud or exchange nodes and a supported use case need project-specific evidence; national growth alone is insufficient.

Project team

Appointments are limited to the project, phase and scope supported by each source.

Architect

RKD ArchitectsOther projects

Agent named in original planning register and 2021 extension; no current delivery appointment verified.

Appointment source

Unlisted roles have no project-specific appointment recorded.

Sources

Publication dates are shown where known. Review dates do not establish approval or commissioning.

Original documents and maps retain their rights. Public access does not grant commercial redistribution rights.